Regenerative Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis and Chondral Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

医学 间充质干细胞 荟萃分析 骨关节炎 再生医学 干细胞 病理 生物 替代医学 遗传学
作者
Bhargavi Maheshwer,Evan M. Polce,Katlynn Paul,Brady T. Williams,Theodore S. Wolfson,Adam B. Yanke,Nikhil N. Verma,Brian J. Cole,Jorge Chahla
出处
期刊:Arthroscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:37 (1): 362-378 被引量:75
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.037
摘要

Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on cartilage regeneration and patient-reported pain and function. Methods A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using a PRISMA checklist. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (2008-2019), EMBASE (2008-2019), and MEDLINE (2008-2019) were queried in July 2019 for literature reporting use of stem cells to treat knee osteoarthritis or chondral defects. Data describing administered treatment, subject population, injection type, duration of follow-up, pain and functional outcomes, and radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black scale. Meta-analyses adjusted for random effects were performed, calculating pooled effect sizes in terms of patient-reported pain and function, cartilage quality, and cartilage volume. Results Twenty-five studies with 439 subjects were identified. There was no significant difference in pain improvement between MSC treatment and controls (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.23, P = .30). However, MSC treatment was significantly favored for functional improvement (SMD = 0.66, P < .001). There was improvement in cartilage volume after MSC treatment (SMD = 0.84, P < .001). Regarding cartilage quality, meta-analysis resulted in a small, nonsignificant effect size of 0.37 (95%, –0.03 to 0.77, P = .07). There was risk for potential bias among included studies, with 17 (68%) receiving either a grade of “poor” or “fair.” Conclusions The pooled SMD from meta-analyses showed statistically significant effects of MSC on self-reported physical function but not self-reported pain. MSCs provided functional benefit only in patients who underwent concomitant surgery. However, this must be interpreted with caution, as there was substantial variability in MSC composition and mode of delivery. MSC treatment provided significant improvement in cartilage volume but not cartilage quality. Preliminary data regarding therapeutic properties of MSC treatment suggest significant heterogeneity in the current literature, and risk of bias is not negligible. Level of Evidence II, Systematic Review and Meta-analysis To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on cartilage regeneration and patient-reported pain and function. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using a PRISMA checklist. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (2008-2019), EMBASE (2008-2019), and MEDLINE (2008-2019) were queried in July 2019 for literature reporting use of stem cells to treat knee osteoarthritis or chondral defects. Data describing administered treatment, subject population, injection type, duration of follow-up, pain and functional outcomes, and radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black scale. Meta-analyses adjusted for random effects were performed, calculating pooled effect sizes in terms of patient-reported pain and function, cartilage quality, and cartilage volume. Twenty-five studies with 439 subjects were identified. There was no significant difference in pain improvement between MSC treatment and controls (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.23, P = .30). However, MSC treatment was significantly favored for functional improvement (SMD = 0.66, P < .001). There was improvement in cartilage volume after MSC treatment (SMD = 0.84, P < .001). Regarding cartilage quality, meta-analysis resulted in a small, nonsignificant effect size of 0.37 (95%, –0.03 to 0.77, P = .07). There was risk for potential bias among included studies, with 17 (68%) receiving either a grade of “poor” or “fair.” The pooled SMD from meta-analyses showed statistically significant effects of MSC on self-reported physical function but not self-reported pain. MSCs provided functional benefit only in patients who underwent concomitant surgery. However, this must be interpreted with caution, as there was substantial variability in MSC composition and mode of delivery. MSC treatment provided significant improvement in cartilage volume but not cartilage quality. Preliminary data regarding therapeutic properties of MSC treatment suggest significant heterogeneity in the current literature, and risk of bias is not negligible.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大橙子发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
2秒前
Zhh完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
Tina完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
微生完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
chhzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
飞舞伤寒发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
曾珍发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
qwe完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Xdz完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
cai完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
雨恋凡尘完成签到,获得积分0
15秒前
羊羔肉完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
胖丁完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
笨笨凡松完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
飞舞伤寒完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
贝利亚完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
喜多多的小眼静完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
Dsunflower完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
羊羔肉发布了新的文献求助50
24秒前
半夏发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
大橙子发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
星辰大海应助贝利亚采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
sunny心晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
独特的凝云完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
TheDing完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
传奇3应助lenetivy采纳,获得10
32秒前
积极的忆曼完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
酒剑仙完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
YANGMJ完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
xialuoke完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
scinature发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
35秒前
35秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038201
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575940
关于积分的说明 11373987
捐赠科研通 3305747
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819274
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892662
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022