替罗非班
医学
改良兰金量表
荟萃分析
内科学
随机对照试验
科克伦图书馆
神经学
相对风险
神经组阅片室
冲程(发动机)
入射(几何)
置信区间
外科
缺血性中风
心肌梗塞
缺血
工程类
物理
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
光学
精神科
机械工程
作者
Yingying Sun,Zhen‐Ni Guo,Xiuli Yan,Meiqi Wang,Peng Zhang,Haiqiang Qin,Yan Wang,Hong-Jing Zhu,Yi Yang
出处
期刊:Neuroradiology
[Springer Nature]
日期:2020-08-25
卷期号:63 (1): 17-25
被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00234-020-02530-9
摘要
Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been widely used for treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the safety and efficacy of treating AIS with tirofiban combined with EVT remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate this treatment. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared treatment with tirofiban combined with EVT and EVT alone were included in our meta-analysis. Those published from inception to March 31, 2020, were searched using the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Safety was assessed based on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) incidence and 3-month mortality. Efficacy was assessed based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months post-EVT and recanalization rates. Data were analyzed using either the random-effects or fixed-effects model based on the heterogeneity of studies. In total, one RCT, six prospective studies, and four retrospective studies (2387 AIS cases) were assessed. Our meta-analysis showed that tirofiban combined with EVT did not increase sICH risk (RR, 1.06; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.42; P = 0.72) and 3-month mortality (RR, 0.87; 95%CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P = 0.12). Recanalization rates were not significantly different between patients treated with tirofiban combined with EVT and those treated with EVT alone (RR, 1.04; 95%CI, 1.00 to 1.08; P = 0.07), but tirofiban combined with EVT was significantly associated with favorable functional outcomes (mRS score, 0-2) in AIS patients (RR, 1.13; 95%CI, 1.02 to 1.25; P = 0.02). Tirofiban combined with EVT appears to be safe and potentially effective in treating AIS.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI