类黄酮
医学
随机对照试验
槲皮素
血压
儿茶素
内科学
药理学
化学
生物化学
多酚
抗氧化剂
作者
Colin D. Kay,Lee Hooper,Paul A. Kroon,Eric B. Rimm,Aedín Cassidy
标识
DOI:10.1002/mnfr.201200363
摘要
Scope Previous systematic reviews suggest beneficial effects of flavonoids on biomarkers of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) risk, but have overlooked the impact of dose response or food complexity. The aim of the present study was to examine the relative impact of composition, flavonoid structure and dose. Methods and results MEDLINE , EMBASE and C ochrane were searched for randomised controlled trials ( RCT s) of flavonoids or flavonoid‐rich foods/extracts. Flavonoid composition was established using United States Department of Agriculture ( USDA ) and P henol‐ E xplorer databases. Effects of six flavonoid subgroups on endothelial function (flow‐mediated dilation; FMD ), and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were assessed by random effects meta‐analyses and regression analyses. Meta‐analyses of combined flavonoid subclasses showed significant improvements in FMD (chronic, 0.73% (0.17, 1.30) 14 RCT s; acute, 2.33% (1.58, 3.08) 18 RCT s) and blood pressures (systolic, –1.46 mmHg (–2.38, –0.53) 63 RCT s; diastolic, –1.25 mmHg (–1.82, –0.67) 63 RCT s). Similar benefits were observed for the flavan‐3‐ol, catechol flavonoids (catechins, quercetin, cyanidin etc.), procyanidins, epicatechin and catechin subgroups. Dose‐response relationships were non‐linear for FMD ( R 2 ≤ 0.30), with greater associations observed when applying polynomial regression analyses ( R 2 ≤ 0.72); there was no indication of a dose response for blood pressure. Conclusion The present analysis suggests that flavonoid bioactivity does not follow a classical linear dose‐response association and this may have important biological implications.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI