Agreement between the GLIM criteria and PG-SGA in a mixed patient population at a nutrition outpatient clinic

医学 营养不良 门诊部 金标准(测试) 分级(工程) 儿科 人口 内科学 环境卫生 工程类 土木工程
作者
Kristin Stenger Rosnes,Christine Henriksen,Anne Høidalen,Ingvild Paur
出处
期刊:Clinical Nutrition [Elsevier]
卷期号:40 (8): 5030-5037 被引量:23
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.07.019
摘要

Background & aimsThe Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria is a step-wise process including a screening tool of choice for risk assessment of malnutrition before assessment of diagnosis and grading of malnutrition severity. The agreement between GLIM and the established malnutrition assessment method Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is uncertain. Also, several aspects of GLIM remain to be clearly defined. In this study, we compared diagnosis of malnutrition with the GLIM criteria to the PG-SGA, and explored the differences between the methods.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at the Nutrition Outpatient Clinic at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Patients were included from September–December 2019. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) was used as the screening tool in the GLIM process before diagnosing and grading the severity of malnutrition. Results are presented with and without the initial risk screening. The diagnostic results from the GLIM process were compared to the malnutrition diagnosis using the PG-SGA.ResultsIn total, 144 patients, median age 58 years, participated in the study. The full GLIM process identified 36% of the patients as malnourished, while the PG-SGA identified 69% of the patients as malnourished. Comparison of GLIM and PG-SGA showed fair agreement, however the agreement was better when the NRS-2002 screening was excluded. Considering the PG-SGA a gold standard, GLIM had a sensitivity of 51% and a specificity of 98%. The introduction of new cut-off values for fat-free mass did not considerably alter the diagnosis of malnutrition within GLIM.ConclusionsThe GLIM criteria showed only fair agreement with the PG-SGA, however the agreement was better when the initial NRS-2002 screening was excluded. A joint consensus on how to perform the GLIM process is needed for comparisons of future studies, and before routine use in clinical practice.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Akim应助hyw010724采纳,获得10
1秒前
Orange应助从容的白竹采纳,获得10
2秒前
5秒前
sun完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
cctv18应助嘻嘻采纳,获得10
6秒前
热心的思天完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
安静幻枫应助Hongni采纳,获得20
9秒前
珍珠发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
穆紫应助热心的思天采纳,获得10
12秒前
Logan发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Roach完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Negan完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
林夏完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
万能图书馆应助nwds采纳,获得10
15秒前
辛勤的小熊猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
Billy应助Jana采纳,获得10
15秒前
17秒前
Billy应助自信小熊猫采纳,获得10
18秒前
糟糕的又亦完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
zhuhaishan发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
Phoenix ZHANG完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
嘻嘻完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
研友_ZAVbe8应助fantasy采纳,获得100
20秒前
Aqua完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
23秒前
嘻嘻发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
炙热靖雁发布了新的文献求助40
28秒前
29秒前
瑾玉发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
旖旎完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
Mn发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
36秒前
慕青应助Freja采纳,获得10
36秒前
Shuo Yang发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 1500
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 799
Livre et militantisme : La Cité éditeur 1958-1967 500
Retention of title in secured transactions law from a creditor's perspective: A comparative analysis of selected (non-)functional approaches 500
"Sixth plenary session of the Eighth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China" 400
Introduction to Modern Controls, with illustrations in MATLAB and Python 310
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3057308
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2713802
关于积分的说明 7437402
捐赠科研通 2358921
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1249607
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 607190
版权声明 596314