Agreement between the GLIM criteria and PG-SGA in a mixed patient population at a nutrition outpatient clinic

医学 营养不良 门诊部 金标准(测试) 分级(工程) 儿科 人口 内科学 环境卫生 工程类 土木工程
作者
Kristin Stenger Rosnes,Christine Henriksen,Anne Høidalen,Ingvild Paur
出处
期刊:Clinical Nutrition [Elsevier]
卷期号:40 (8): 5030-5037 被引量:23
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.07.019
摘要

Background & aimsThe Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria is a step-wise process including a screening tool of choice for risk assessment of malnutrition before assessment of diagnosis and grading of malnutrition severity. The agreement between GLIM and the established malnutrition assessment method Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is uncertain. Also, several aspects of GLIM remain to be clearly defined. In this study, we compared diagnosis of malnutrition with the GLIM criteria to the PG-SGA, and explored the differences between the methods.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at the Nutrition Outpatient Clinic at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Patients were included from September–December 2019. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) was used as the screening tool in the GLIM process before diagnosing and grading the severity of malnutrition. Results are presented with and without the initial risk screening. The diagnostic results from the GLIM process were compared to the malnutrition diagnosis using the PG-SGA.ResultsIn total, 144 patients, median age 58 years, participated in the study. The full GLIM process identified 36% of the patients as malnourished, while the PG-SGA identified 69% of the patients as malnourished. Comparison of GLIM and PG-SGA showed fair agreement, however the agreement was better when the NRS-2002 screening was excluded. Considering the PG-SGA a gold standard, GLIM had a sensitivity of 51% and a specificity of 98%. The introduction of new cut-off values for fat-free mass did not considerably alter the diagnosis of malnutrition within GLIM.ConclusionsThe GLIM criteria showed only fair agreement with the PG-SGA, however the agreement was better when the initial NRS-2002 screening was excluded. A joint consensus on how to perform the GLIM process is needed for comparisons of future studies, and before routine use in clinical practice.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
研友_LOokQL发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
不配.应助DianaRang采纳,获得10
7秒前
华仔应助jbear采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助搬石头采纳,获得10
11秒前
robi发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
酷酷小子完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
研友_LOokQL完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
皮皮发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
激情的世平完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
K. G.完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
asdfj给asdfj的求助进行了留言
18秒前
王爱灿完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
熱風完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
青藤完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助云_123采纳,获得10
20秒前
nicol.z完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
我是老大应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
丘比特应助激情的世平采纳,获得10
24秒前
斯文败类应助nicol.z采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
26秒前
27秒前
ShuangWeng应助搬石头采纳,获得10
27秒前
王森发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
29秒前
30秒前
尼克发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
云_123发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
啦啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
RRRR发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Le dégorgement réflexe des Acridiens 800
Defense against predation 800
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3134943
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2785901
关于积分的说明 7774393
捐赠科研通 2441736
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1298162
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625079
版权声明 600825