Evaluating the Content Validity of Digital Literacy Instrument for School Teachers in Malaysia through Expert Judgement

内容有效性 表面有效性 结构效度 心理学 判断 数字素养 比例(比率) 有效性 索引(排版) 可靠性(半导体) 数学教育 应用心理学 读写能力 计算机科学 教育学 心理测量学 发展心理学 万维网 功率(物理) 物理 量子力学 政治学 法学
作者
Mohammad Fazli Baharuddin,Mohamad Noorman Masrek,Shamila Mohamed Shuhidan,Mohammad Hudzari bin Haji Razali,Mohd Saiful Rahman
出处
期刊:International journal emerging technology and advanced engineering [IJETAE Publication House]
卷期号:11 (7): 71-78 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.46338/ijetae0721_09
摘要

— In the development of digital technology, schools must equip students with digital literacy skills to develop thinking both critically and creatively and make teaching and learning relevant to the students. There are various measuring instruments that have been developed to assess digital literacy for various target groups. However, quality and valid instruments are still limited and lacking. It is important to apply a valid measuring instrument for digital literacy based on its results in the case of overlapping and ambiguous constructions in the name of digital literacy. Thus, to assess the content validity of the questionnaire that had been generated to evaluate digital literacy of the school teachers is the main focus. The validity of the content was used as a criterion to confirm that the questionnaire was of high quality. The instrument's content validity was assessed according to the feedbacks of six professional in the field. The item content validity index and scale content validity index were implemented for content validity. Three (3) constructs namely; technical, cognitive, and social-emotional contain 6 items each were identified. The results of content validity index (I-CVI) showed between 0.97 to 1 and the scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) for the technical, cognitive, and social-emotional dimension of digital literacy was 1.00, 0.97, and 0.97 respectively. The questionnaire was identified with acceptable content validity. Further research able to guarantee that the questionnaire is checked for reliability as well as the other types of validity, including as face validity, construct validity, and criterion validity, in order to improve the assessment instrument's usefulness. Keywords— Instrument Assessment, Scale Content Validity Index, Content Validity Index, Digital Literacy, School Teachers.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
lyn完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
kingmin应助实验室的亡灵采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
爱笑砖家完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
可爱的函函应助张汐熙采纳,获得10
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
泡泡熊不吐泡泡完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
舍得完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
领导范儿应助小纯洁采纳,获得10
6秒前
蓝色飞贼完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
www发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
筱曼发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
7秒前
历史真相发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
Sidous_完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
优雅亦绿发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
尔蝶完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
CodeCraft应助TGU的小马同学采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
nc应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
marg应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
lijianguo应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
11秒前
迟大猫应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The Insulin Resistance Epidemic: Uncovering the Root Cause of Chronic Disease  500
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3662961
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3223721
关于积分的说明 9752858
捐赠科研通 2933645
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1606229
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 758325
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734785