内容有效性
表面有效性
结构效度
心理学
判断
数字素养
比例(比率)
有效性
索引(排版)
可靠性(半导体)
数学教育
应用心理学
读写能力
计算机科学
教育学
心理测量学
发展心理学
万维网
功率(物理)
物理
量子力学
政治学
法学
作者
Mohammad Fazli Baharuddin,Mohamad Noorman Masrek,Shamila Mohamed Shuhidan,Mohammad Hudzari bin Haji Razali,Mohd Saiful Rahman
出处
期刊:International journal emerging technology and advanced engineering
[IJETAE Publication House]
日期:2021-07-26
卷期号:11 (7): 71-78
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.46338/ijetae0721_09
摘要
— In the development of digital technology, schools must equip students with digital literacy skills to develop thinking both critically and creatively and make teaching and learning relevant to the students. There are various measuring instruments that have been developed to assess digital literacy for various target groups. However, quality and valid instruments are still limited and lacking. It is important to apply a valid measuring instrument for digital literacy based on its results in the case of overlapping and ambiguous constructions in the name of digital literacy. Thus, to assess the content validity of the questionnaire that had been generated to evaluate digital literacy of the school teachers is the main focus. The validity of the content was used as a criterion to confirm that the questionnaire was of high quality. The instrument's content validity was assessed according to the feedbacks of six professional in the field. The item content validity index and scale content validity index were implemented for content validity. Three (3) constructs namely; technical, cognitive, and social-emotional contain 6 items each were identified. The results of content validity index (I-CVI) showed between 0.97 to 1 and the scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) for the technical, cognitive, and social-emotional dimension of digital literacy was 1.00, 0.97, and 0.97 respectively. The questionnaire was identified with acceptable content validity. Further research able to guarantee that the questionnaire is checked for reliability as well as the other types of validity, including as face validity, construct validity, and criterion validity, in order to improve the assessment instrument's usefulness. Keywords— Instrument Assessment, Scale Content Validity Index, Content Validity Index, Digital Literacy, School Teachers.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI