医学
血压
混淆
回廊的
内科学
动态血压
去神经支配
回顾性队列研究
抗高血压药
队列
心脏病学
作者
Christian Ott,Felix Mahfoud,Axel Schmid,Sebastian Ewen,Stefan W. Toennes,Markus R. Meyer,Andreas G. Helfer,Hans H. Maurer,Tilmann Ditting,Roland Veelken,Ina Živanović,Michael Uder,Michael Böhm,Roland E. Schmieder
标识
DOI:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001110
摘要
Data on the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of renal denervation (RDN) in moderate treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH) are limited. Moreover, change of adherence to medication, as one potential confounder of BP response, has never been analyzed rigorously in this group of patients. We analyzed the effect of RDN on BP in patients with moderate TRH who were retrospectively found to be completely adherent to their antihypertensive medication.Our study cohort comprised 40 patients with moderate TRH [office BP ≥ 140/90 but <160/100 mmHg and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) ≥130/80 mmHg] who underwent catheter-based RDN. Further major inclusion criterion was complete adherence to their medication (≥80% intake of their prescribed antihypertensive drugs) at baseline (assessed by retrospective toxicological analysis).Six months after RDN, office BP was reduced by -10/-6 mmHg (SBP: 149 ± 6 vs. 139 ± 15 mmHg; DBP: 81 ± 12 vs. 75 ± 10 mmHg; both P < 0.001) and 24-h ABPM by -7/-4 mmHg (SBP: 150 ± 14 vs. 143 ± 16 mmHg, P = 0.005; DBP: 82 ± 10 vs. 78 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.009). Number of prescribed antihypertensive medication [6.0 (5.0-6.0) vs. 5.5 (5.0-6.0), P = 0.013] and adherence rate (95.2 ± 7.6 vs. 91.7 ± 13.9%, P = 0.065) was slightly reduced 6 months after RDN, both likely to underestimate the true BP reduction.Thus, our data indicate that even after given full respect to drug adherence as potential confounder of BP response after RDN, both office and 24-h ABPM were substantially reduced in patients with moderate TRH.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI