Age-dependent association of central blood pressure with cardiovascular outcomes: a cohort study involving 34 289 participants using the UK biobank

医学 生命银行 队列 血压 联想(心理学) 队列研究 内科学 生物信息学 生物 认识论 哲学
作者
J.K. Cruickshank
出处
期刊:Journal of Hypertension [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:42 (5): 768-768
标识
DOI:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003701
摘要

UK Biobank remains a useful large-scale, open access data source, which this paper exploits for central blood pressure (cBP), estimated by the validated Vicorder arm-cuff device. Note that cBP parameters were estimated from brachial S/DBP waveforms "self-calibrated to brachial SBP/DBP by applying a validated brachial-to-aortic transfer function." Here validation, or evaluation, still allows considerable variation in cBPs compared with simultaneous pressures recorded invasively, averaging −4 ± SD 7.4 mmHg. Using brachial S/DBP for calibration underestimates intra-arterial 'real cBP' by some 6mmHg (see their [17]), whereas mean BP performs better. The 'transfer function' may or may not help, as discussed in Jim Sharman's Artery Society paper [1]. We do not use the 'real' BP clinically, only brachial. So, what does this paper add? Although both central and brachial BPs predict outcomes, the claim is that cBP here performs better than routine brachial BP in predicting events only in those aged <65 years, after adjusting for a variety of standard risk factors and appropriate statistical analysis. Yet, the overall cSBP prediction, only moderate for <65 s anyway with an hazard ratio of 1.13 per 10 mmHg in SBP change, is only 1% better than with brachial and borderline significant – trivial. Differences for using central versus peripheral pulse pressure as predictors were marginally greater by some 4% than for the central-brachial SBP effect. However, tests for improved discriminative ability between either cSBP or cPP were not significant. In summary, until the vagaries of estimating central BP based on inevitable current brachial BP calibration are eliminated – and these methods are emerging [2,3] – to this commentator, central BP offers little of value over the hugely 'validated' brachial BP. Using arterial function measured as aortic pulse wave velocity is quite another and more valuable a matter – not available in UK Biobank. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Conflicts of interest Prof. Cruickshank was President of the Artery Society 2026–2018.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
emoji发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
耿耿发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
passion完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
小二郎应助zl12采纳,获得10
1秒前
Orange应助九九采纳,获得10
1秒前
脑洞疼应助科研工作者采纳,获得10
2秒前
王硕硕发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
哒哒哒发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Hello应助lky采纳,获得10
3秒前
香蕉觅云应助花朝十一采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
英俊的铭应助zhzhzh采纳,获得10
4秒前
幸福烤鸡发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
李健应助务实的机器猫采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
哈皮发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
刘麦子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
xiongyh10发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
t东流水完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
peng完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
丘比特应助呆萌冷风采纳,获得10
8秒前
好运设计完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
李健应助aldeheby采纳,获得10
9秒前
领导范儿应助xixi采纳,获得10
9秒前
Chunlan发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5719256
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5255673
关于积分的说明 15288302
捐赠科研通 4869143
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2614653
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1564667
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1521894