Age-dependent association of central blood pressure with cardiovascular outcomes: a cohort study involving 34 289 participants using the UK biobank

医学 生命银行 队列 血压 联想(心理学) 队列研究 内科学 生物信息学 哲学 认识论 生物
作者
J.K. Cruickshank
出处
期刊:Journal of Hypertension [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:42 (5): 768-768
标识
DOI:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003701
摘要

UK Biobank remains a useful large-scale, open access data source, which this paper exploits for central blood pressure (cBP), estimated by the validated Vicorder arm-cuff device. Note that cBP parameters were estimated from brachial S/DBP waveforms "self-calibrated to brachial SBP/DBP by applying a validated brachial-to-aortic transfer function." Here validation, or evaluation, still allows considerable variation in cBPs compared with simultaneous pressures recorded invasively, averaging −4 ± SD 7.4 mmHg. Using brachial S/DBP for calibration underestimates intra-arterial 'real cBP' by some 6mmHg (see their [17]), whereas mean BP performs better. The 'transfer function' may or may not help, as discussed in Jim Sharman's Artery Society paper [1]. We do not use the 'real' BP clinically, only brachial. So, what does this paper add? Although both central and brachial BPs predict outcomes, the claim is that cBP here performs better than routine brachial BP in predicting events only in those aged <65 years, after adjusting for a variety of standard risk factors and appropriate statistical analysis. Yet, the overall cSBP prediction, only moderate for <65 s anyway with an hazard ratio of 1.13 per 10 mmHg in SBP change, is only 1% better than with brachial and borderline significant – trivial. Differences for using central versus peripheral pulse pressure as predictors were marginally greater by some 4% than for the central-brachial SBP effect. However, tests for improved discriminative ability between either cSBP or cPP were not significant. In summary, until the vagaries of estimating central BP based on inevitable current brachial BP calibration are eliminated – and these methods are emerging [2,3] – to this commentator, central BP offers little of value over the hugely 'validated' brachial BP. Using arterial function measured as aortic pulse wave velocity is quite another and more valuable a matter – not available in UK Biobank. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Conflicts of interest Prof. Cruickshank was President of the Artery Society 2026–2018.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
核桃发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
传奇3应助lily采纳,获得10
6秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6应助smile采纳,获得10
8秒前
枯藤老柳树完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
可爱的函函应助Vv采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
你好完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
hyx9504完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
蓬蓬发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
LFQ1998发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
光之剑发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
hserh完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
lmc发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
NJY发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Esther发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
侠客完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
FYH发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
pigeonKimi发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
wansida完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
勤恳靖巧完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
眯眯眼的尔琴完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
香蕉觅云应助优美飞薇采纳,获得30
21秒前
22秒前
最后一名发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
Bertha完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
光之剑完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
Comprehensive Toxicology Fourth Edition 24000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
World Nuclear Fuel Report: Global Scenarios for Demand and Supply Availability 2025-2040 800
Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning 800
Risankizumab Versus Ustekinumab For Patients with Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease: Results from the Phase 3B SEQUENCE Study 600
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5134322
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4335087
关于积分的说明 13505951
捐赠科研通 4172482
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2287697
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1288658
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1229444