Age-dependent association of central blood pressure with cardiovascular outcomes: a cohort study involving 34 289 participants using the UK biobank

医学 生命银行 队列 血压 联想(心理学) 队列研究 内科学 生物信息学 哲学 认识论 生物
作者
J.K. Cruickshank
出处
期刊:Journal of Hypertension [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:42 (5): 768-768
标识
DOI:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003701
摘要

UK Biobank remains a useful large-scale, open access data source, which this paper exploits for central blood pressure (cBP), estimated by the validated Vicorder arm-cuff device. Note that cBP parameters were estimated from brachial S/DBP waveforms "self-calibrated to brachial SBP/DBP by applying a validated brachial-to-aortic transfer function." Here validation, or evaluation, still allows considerable variation in cBPs compared with simultaneous pressures recorded invasively, averaging −4 ± SD 7.4 mmHg. Using brachial S/DBP for calibration underestimates intra-arterial 'real cBP' by some 6mmHg (see their [17]), whereas mean BP performs better. The 'transfer function' may or may not help, as discussed in Jim Sharman's Artery Society paper [1]. We do not use the 'real' BP clinically, only brachial. So, what does this paper add? Although both central and brachial BPs predict outcomes, the claim is that cBP here performs better than routine brachial BP in predicting events only in those aged <65 years, after adjusting for a variety of standard risk factors and appropriate statistical analysis. Yet, the overall cSBP prediction, only moderate for <65 s anyway with an hazard ratio of 1.13 per 10 mmHg in SBP change, is only 1% better than with brachial and borderline significant – trivial. Differences for using central versus peripheral pulse pressure as predictors were marginally greater by some 4% than for the central-brachial SBP effect. However, tests for improved discriminative ability between either cSBP or cPP were not significant. In summary, until the vagaries of estimating central BP based on inevitable current brachial BP calibration are eliminated – and these methods are emerging [2,3] – to this commentator, central BP offers little of value over the hugely 'validated' brachial BP. Using arterial function measured as aortic pulse wave velocity is quite another and more valuable a matter – not available in UK Biobank. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Conflicts of interest Prof. Cruickshank was President of the Artery Society 2026–2018.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
yueyue发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
洁净若烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
呆萌树叶发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
vvillen完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
linear发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
流光发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
红岩发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
qqq发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
sunny完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
宋佳发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
粥粥完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
粥粥发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
烟花应助陈秋迎采纳,获得10
13秒前
华仔应助sunny采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
phy发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
yueyue完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
14秒前
acchangg完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
无私的以冬完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
喜悦之卉发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
淡定的小蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
kyrie完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
一叶子发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
shufessm完成签到,获得积分0
17秒前
袁艺珊发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 1500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6010376
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7554961
关于积分的说明 16133402
捐赠科研通 5157004
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2762212
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1740776
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1633416