First Passage Dynamic Reliability Analysis of Non-Stationary and Non-Gaussian Buffeting Random Dynamic Responses of Long-Span Suspension Bridge

In the complex mountain wind environment, especially in the strong wind, fluctuating wind speed is a non-stationary and non-Gaussian random process. With the increase of suspension bridges’ span, they are more sensitive to wind-induced vibration response. In this paper, a non-stationary and non-Gaussian buffeting reliability analysis method for long-span bridges is presented. Firstly, the non-stationary wind speed is simulated by the modulation function based on the stationary wind speed model. Secondly, the load is obtained by simulated wind speed, the obtained loads are loaded on the finite element model by ANSYS and the whole bridge time-domain analysis is performed, the time history of displacement response is obtained. Thirdly, based on the first excursion failure criterion of random vibration, the samples of the non-stationary and non-Gaussian displacement time history are transformed into a standard Gaussian process through a modified Fleishman approximation method, and then the non-stationary Poisson distribution method is used for structural reliability analysis. Finally, a mountainous long-span suspension bridge is used as the engineering background, and the proposed reliability analysis method is applied to analyze the reliability of the bridge. The influence of different wind attack angles and modulation functions on the dynamic reliability of the bridge is further studied. The results indicate that the displacement response obtained by the transformation of non-stationary and non-Gaussian random process is less reliable than that obtained by traditional analysis method. Its dynamic reliability is maximum at 1[Formula: see text] wind attack angle, the reliability of negative wind attack angle is lower than that of positive wind attack angle, and decreases with the increase of wind attack angle. The reliability obtained by using different modulation functions is lower than that of traditional method. If the traditional analysis method is still used for reliability analysis, it will produce unsafe consequences and reduce the engineering safety reserve.