医学
随机对照试验
临床终点
人口
内科学
危险系数
黑色素瘤
胃肠病学
外科
置信区间
癌症研究
环境卫生
作者
Roger Olofsson Bagge,Axel Nelson,Amir Shafazand,Charlotta All‐Eriksson,Christian Cahlin,Nils Elander,Anders Gustavsson,Hildur Helgadóttir,Jens Folke Kiilgaard,Sara Kinhult,Ingrid Ljuslinder,Jan Mattsson,Magnus Rizell,Malin Sternby Eilard,Gustav Ullenhag,Jonas A. Nilsson,Lars Ny,Per Lindnér
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2024-02-29
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000006255
摘要
Objective: To investigate overall survival (OS) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of first-line isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) compared to best alternative care (BAC) for patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases. Summary Background Data: Approximately half of patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic disease, most commonly in the liver and systemic treatment options are limited. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) is a locoregional therapy with high response rates but with unclear effect on overall survival (OS). Methods: In this phase III randomized controlled multicenter trial (the SCANDIUM trial) patients with previously untreated isolated uveal melanoma liver metastases were included between 2013-2021, with at least 24 months of follow-up. The planned accrual was 90 patients randomized 1:1 to receive a one-time treatment with IHP or BAC. Crossover to IHP was not allowed. The primary endpoint was the 24-month OS rate, with the hypothesis of a treatment effect leading to a 50% OS rate in the IHP group compared to 20% in the control group. HRQOL was measured by the EuroQol 5-domains 3-levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire over 12 months. Results: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included 87 patients randomized to the IHP group (43 patients; 41 [89%] received IHP) or the control group (44 patients). The control group received chemotherapy (49%), immunotherapy (39%), or localized interventions (9%). In the ITT population, the median PFS was 7.4 months in the IHP group compared with 3.3 months in the control group, with a hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12-0.36). The 24-month OS rate was 46.5% in the IHP group versus 29.5% in the control group ( P =0.12). The median OS was 21.7 months versus 17.6 months, with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.37-1.10). EQ-5D-3L showed a sustained high health status for the IHP group over 12 months, compared to a deteriorating trend in the control group. Conclusions: For patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma, IHP offers high response rates translating to a benefit in PFS including a trend of better HRQOL compared to the control group. However, the primary endpoint of OS at 24 months was not met.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI