接收机工作特性
医学
心脏病学
曲线下面积
射血分数
膨胀(度量空间)
磁共振成像
内科学
心室功能
冲程容积
核医学
放射科
数学
心力衰竭
组合数学
作者
Son Q. Duong,Akhil Vaid,Ha My T. Vy,Liam R. Butler,Joshua Lampert,Robert H. Pass,Alexander W. Charney,Jagat Narula,Rohan Khera,Ankit Sakhuja,Hayit Greenspan,Bruce D. Gelb,Ron Do,Girish N. Nadkarni
标识
DOI:10.1161/jaha.123.031671
摘要
Background Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and end‐diastolic volume (RVEDV) are not readily assessed through traditional modalities. Deep learning–enabled ECG analysis for estimation of right ventricular (RV) size or function is unexplored. Methods and Results We trained a deep learning–ECG model to predict RV dilation (RVEDV >120 mL/m 2 ), RV dysfunction (RVEF ≤40%), and numerical RVEDV and RVEF from a 12‐lead ECG paired with reference‐standard cardiac magnetic resonance imaging volumetric measurements in UK Biobank (UKBB; n=42 938). We fine‐tuned in a multicenter health system (MSH original [Mount Sinai Hospital]; n=3019) with prospective validation over 4 months (MSH validation ; n=115). We evaluated performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for categorical and mean absolute error for continuous measures overall and in key subgroups. We assessed the association of RVEF prediction with transplant‐free survival with Cox proportional hazards models. The prevalence of RV dysfunction for UKBB/MSH original /MSH validation cohorts was 1.0%/18.0%/15.7%, respectively. RV dysfunction model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for UKBB/MSH original /MSH validation cohorts was 0.86/0.81/0.77, respectively. The prevalence of RV dilation for UKBB/MSH original /MSH validation cohorts was 1.6%/10.6%/4.3%. RV dilation model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for UKBB/MSH original /MSH validation cohorts was 0.91/0.81/0.92, respectively. MSH original mean absolute error was RVEF=7.8% and RVEDV=17.6 mL/m 2 . The performance of the RVEF model was similar in key subgroups including with and without left ventricular dysfunction. Over a median follow‐up of 2.3 years, predicted RVEF was associated with adjusted transplant‐free survival (hazard ratio, 1.40 for each 10% decrease; P =0.031). Conclusions Deep learning–ECG analysis can identify significant cardiac magnetic resonance imaging RV dysfunction and dilation with good performance. Predicted RVEF is associated with clinical outcome.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI