Revisiting Ediacaran to early Cambrian depositional history of western North China: did it remain passive until the mid-Paleozoic?

Whether the North China Block (NCB) remained in extension from its cratonization to the mid-Paleozoic is questionable. Here, we conduct a synthesis of zircon U–Pb data of Statherian–Ordovician sandstones to provide a historical review of provenance changes in the western NCB through time. In contrast to typical NCB basement sources characterized by c. 2.7–1.8 Ga ages with spectral peaks at c. 2.5 and 1.9 Ga during much of c. 1.8–0.45 Ga, Ediacaran to Cambrian Stage 3 succussions contain abundant zircons with Meso- to Neoproterozoic ages. The exotic provenance, further verified by southeastward palaeo-flow, implies sources from the western Bainaimiao arc terrane (BAT), where basement rocks with suitable ages exist. Hence, the BAT should have evolved at the NCB margin before c. 0.56 Ga, but after rifting of the NCB (until c. 773 Ma). This event led to a craton-wide stratigraphic break during the Mesoproterozoic–Ediacaran. The presence of 521–515 Ma detrital zircons in Cambrian Stage 3 strata indicates subduction onset of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean before c. 515 Ma, coincident with the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary paraconformity. A sequence of depositional shifts triggered by the tectonic activities of the BAT unveils a complicated plate reorganization history of the northern NCB, contesting the view that the NCB remained passive from the Statherian. Supplementary material : Figures S1, S2 and Tables S1 and S2 are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7040743