Why do leaders matter? A revisit of player-turned-coaches from the NBA

篮球 经济 历史 考古
作者
Xiangyi Zhou,Xiaobo He,Jun Deng
出处
期刊:Applied Economics [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:56 (49): 5957-5967
标识
DOI:10.1080/00036846.2023.2266606
摘要

ABSTRACTThis article re-estimates equations that have shown elite basketball players do better as leaders when they turn into coaches. Using comprehensive data from the NBA during the last three decades, we show that player-turned-coaches do not win statistically more matches in regular seasons while they do better in playoffs. The relatively better performance is driven by former guard players who lead to more defensive rebounds, free throws made, and points in the last moment of close matches during playoffs. In further analyses of direct channels, we show that guard-turned-coaches as a good example of expert leaders perform relatively better in strategic decision-making. For indirect channel analysis, we also provide statistical evidence that guard-turned-coaches are more creditable to both the insiders and outsiders of organizations.KEYWORDS: LeaderNBAplayer-turned-coachesstrategic decision-makingJEL CLASSIFICATION: J24M51 AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge Yusen Kwoh, Weihong Zeng, Yi Chen, Chun Liu, Jie Ma, and Botao Qin for their constructive comments. We thank Qingyang Liu, Bingqian Li, Xuanrui Wu, Qian Liu for their excellent research assistance.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 There are some discussions on this topic. For example, using data on British football managers and teams from 1994 to 2007, Bridgewater et al. (Citation2011) study substitution and complementarity between leaders and subordinates and show that managers who themselves played at a higher level raise the productivity of less-skilled teams by more than that of highly skilled teams.2 We do not report 2SLS results as both our full sample and the Goodall et al. (Citation2011) sample with season fixed effects do not provide significant results.3 To support our argument, we provide two types of results. First, we use t-test to check whether player-turned coaches are employed in better teams in terms of the total salary of a team. The results show that layer-turned coaches actually serve for teams with significantly less total salary. Thus, the sampled player-turned coaches are more likely to serve for teams with a lower level of team salary implying a lower level of competiveness. Second, we use the average winning percentage of the former coach as a proxy of team performance prior to the employment of current coach. We run simple OLS and Probit regressions which use the winning percentage as explanatory variables and use a dummy indicating whether a coach was a NBA player as the explained variable. Both results show that the average winning percentage of the former coach cannot explain whether the current coach is a former NBA player or not. Thus, there is no empirical evidence showing that the performance of NBA teams will lead to the choice of coach type in terms of his NBA career. The above results are available upon request.4 Due to the limitation of data, we do not have access to the statistics of close matches before 1997.5 We have checked the history of the NBA during 1997–2003 and found two potential reasons which can explain the insignificant results for the 1997–2003 period in Tables 4. First, the 1998–1999 NBA lockout lasted from July 1 1998 to January 20 1999 and forced the regular season to be a 'semi season' (50 games per team had been shorten). After the lockout teams played at a reduced pace and scoring declined on average by about four points per game per team, and turnovers increased while field goal percentage decreased. Second, the Hall of Fame coach Phil Jackson along with the two superstars Kobe Bryant and Shaquille O'Neal led the Los Angeles Lakers to three consecutive championships between 2000 and 2002. During the Lakers' 'three-peat', the rest NBA teams had less incentive to compete for the championship. This may explain why the impacts of coaches on the team performance became less significant during that period.6 Comparing guard-turned-coaches with non player-turned-coaches yields similar or even larger coefficients as those results in Panel D to Panel F.7 The results are available upon request.Additional informationFundingXiaobo He acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71803128).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
JasperChan发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
yookia应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
1秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
七月半发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
LEMONS应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
大神装发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
小蘑菇应助马素娜采纳,获得10
4秒前
yingying完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
子南完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
甜美无剑发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
解语花应助sophiemore采纳,获得30
6秒前
科研狗完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
kiki134完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
zss完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
张才豪发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
saberynn发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
无心的青寒完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Mistletoe完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (Sixth Edition) 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
Christian Women in Chinese Society: The Anglican Story 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3960936
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3507194
关于积分的说明 11134321
捐赠科研通 3239560
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1790248
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 872244
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 803149