心理学
冲程(发动机)
质量(理念)
心理健康
物理医学与康复
功能(生物学)
感知
应用心理学
临床心理学
医学
精神科
工程类
进化生物学
机械工程
生物
认识论
哲学
神经科学
作者
Lola Qvist Kristensen,Maurits W. van Tulder,Frederik Rosenbæk,Marie Almkvist Muren,Hanne Kaae Kristensen,Lidwine B. Mokkink,Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard
标识
DOI:10.1080/11038128.2023.2258161
摘要
AbstractBackground Various performance-based instruments exist to assess mental function after stroke and users have to select one for research or clinical practice.Objectives To evaluate the measurement properties of performance-based instruments to assess (any aspect of) mental function during activity and participation in persons after stroke.Material and methods We searched in five electronic databases. COSMIN methodology was used to conduct the review. The strength of evidence was assessed using a modified GRADE approach.Results Fifty articles were included reporting on 20 instruments assessing (1) multiple mental functions including ≥ four subdomains (2) attention, memory and executive functions, or single subdomains (3) executive functions, (4) perception, and (5) mental function of language. Highest quality evidence for sufficient results was found for some measurement properties in seven instruments. These instruments included: FIM + FAM, MPAI-4 and EFPT, MET, CBS/KF-NAP, BIT and the Scenario Test.Conclusions Further studies of high methodological quality are needed that evaluate the measurement properties of instruments to allow clinicians and researchers to select the most suitable performance-based measures for purpose.Significance Results may be used to select the most suitable performance-based instrument to measure mental function during activity and participation in persons with stroke.Trial registration number PROSPERO CRD42018086744.Keywords: Strokecognitionmeasurement propertiesvalidityreliabilityICFrehabilitation AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the health science librarian Marie Oesterbye, who assisted with the development of the search strategy.EthicsNo ethical approval is required.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe review was initiated and funded by the Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, and the Research Foundation of Aarhus University Hospital.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI