亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Coronary Physiology Guidance vs Conventional Angiography for Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

传统PCI 部分流量储备 医学 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 血管造影 心脏病学 冠状动脉造影 放射科 内科学 冠状动脉疾病 再狭窄 支架 经皮 心肌梗塞
作者
Simone Biscaglia,Filippo Maria Verardi,Andrea Erriquez,Iginio Colaiori,Marta Helena Cocco,Anna Cantone,Graziella Pompei,Andrea Marrone,Serena Caglioni,Carlo Tumscitz,Carlo Penzo,Marco Manfrini,Antonio Maria Leone,Francesco Versaci,Gianluca Campo
出处
期刊:Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:17 (2): 277-287 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.032
摘要

The debate surrounding the efficacy of coronary physiological guidance compared with conventional angiography in achieving optimal post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) values persists. The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of physiology-guided PCI, using either angiography or microcatheter-derived FFR, over conventional angiography-based PCI in complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIPs). The secondary aim was to establish the noninferiority of angiography-derived FFR guidance compared with microcatheter-derived FFR guidance. Patients with obstructive coronary lesions and meeting CHIP criteria were randomized 2:1 to receive undergo physiology- or angiography-based PCI. Those assigned to the former were randomly allocated to angiography- or microcatheter-derived FFR guidance. CHIP criteria were long lesion (>28 mm), tandem lesions, severe calcifications, severe tortuosity, true bifurcation, in-stent restenosis, and left main stem disease. The primary outcome was invasive post-PCI FFR value. The optimal post-PCI FFR value was defined as >0.86. A total of 305 patients (331 study vessels) were enrolled in the study (101 undergoing conventional angiography-based PCI and 204 physiology-based PCI). Optimal post-PCI FFR values were more frequent in the physiology-based PCI group compared with the conventional angiography-based PCI group (77% vs 54%; absolute difference 23%, relative difference 30%; P < 0.0001). The occurrence of the primary outcome did not differ between the 2 physiology-based PCI subgroups, demonstrating the noninferiority of angiography- vs microcatheter-derived FFR (P < 0.01). In CHIP patients, procedural planning and guidance on the basis of physiology (through either angiography- or microcatheter-derived FFR) are superior to conventional angiography for achieving optimal post-PCI FFR values. (Physiology Optimized Versus Angio-Guided PCI [AQVA-II]; NCT05658952)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
荣浩宇完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
深情安青应助litieniu采纳,获得10
58秒前
1分钟前
9527应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
939901842完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
无情忆灵发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
李欣宇发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
litieniu发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
李欣宇完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
cc完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
无情忆灵完成签到,获得积分20
2分钟前
轻松弘文完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
msn00完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
湖以完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
1111111发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
bkagyin应助1111111采纳,获得10
3分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
来弄完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
冰西瓜完成签到 ,获得积分0
5分钟前
学生信的大叔完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
李东东完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
昔我往矣完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7分钟前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7分钟前
7分钟前
天真茗发布了新的文献求助30
7分钟前
凌宏完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
8分钟前
litieniu发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
小白加油完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
小张完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
大医仁心完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
FeelingUnreal完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Discovery and Development, Volumes 1 - 8, 8 Volume Set, 8th Edition 1800
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Handbook on Climate Mobility 1111
Current concept for improving treatment of prostate cancer based on combination of LH-RH agonists with other agents 1000
Research Handbook on the Law of the Sea 1000
Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (3rd Edition) 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 细胞生物学 基因 电极 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6172149
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7999592
关于积分的说明 16638592
捐赠科研通 5276311
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2814271
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1794031
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1659771