已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Coronary Physiology Guidance vs Conventional Angiography for Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

传统PCI 部分流量储备 医学 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 血管造影 心脏病学 冠状动脉造影 放射科 内科学 冠状动脉疾病 再狭窄 支架 经皮 心肌梗塞
作者
Simone Biscaglia,Filippo Maria Verardi,Andrea Erriquez,Iginio Colaiori,Marta Helena Cocco,Anna Cantone,Graziella Pompei,Andrea Marrone,Serena Caglioni,Carlo Tumscitz,Carlo Penzo,Marco Manfrini,Antonio Maria Leone,Francesco Versaci,Gianluca Campo
出处
期刊:Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:17 (2): 277-287 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.032
摘要

The debate surrounding the efficacy of coronary physiological guidance compared with conventional angiography in achieving optimal post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) values persists. The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of physiology-guided PCI, using either angiography or microcatheter-derived FFR, over conventional angiography-based PCI in complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIPs). The secondary aim was to establish the noninferiority of angiography-derived FFR guidance compared with microcatheter-derived FFR guidance. Patients with obstructive coronary lesions and meeting CHIP criteria were randomized 2:1 to receive undergo physiology- or angiography-based PCI. Those assigned to the former were randomly allocated to angiography- or microcatheter-derived FFR guidance. CHIP criteria were long lesion (>28 mm), tandem lesions, severe calcifications, severe tortuosity, true bifurcation, in-stent restenosis, and left main stem disease. The primary outcome was invasive post-PCI FFR value. The optimal post-PCI FFR value was defined as >0.86. A total of 305 patients (331 study vessels) were enrolled in the study (101 undergoing conventional angiography-based PCI and 204 physiology-based PCI). Optimal post-PCI FFR values were more frequent in the physiology-based PCI group compared with the conventional angiography-based PCI group (77% vs 54%; absolute difference 23%, relative difference 30%; P < 0.0001). The occurrence of the primary outcome did not differ between the 2 physiology-based PCI subgroups, demonstrating the noninferiority of angiography- vs microcatheter-derived FFR (P < 0.01). In CHIP patients, procedural planning and guidance on the basis of physiology (through either angiography- or microcatheter-derived FFR) are superior to conventional angiography for achieving optimal post-PCI FFR values. (Physiology Optimized Versus Angio-Guided PCI [AQVA-II]; NCT05658952)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
qlq完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
蓬荜生辉完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
大力的灵雁应助西瓜妹采纳,获得20
6秒前
YZ发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
Goin完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
FJLSDNMV发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
狐妖完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
淡定钥匙关注了科研通微信公众号
13秒前
SciGPT应助Tracy采纳,获得10
14秒前
moshang发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
小二郎应助怡心亭采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
20秒前
22秒前
tiptip应助san采纳,获得10
22秒前
Earr完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助tianyue采纳,获得10
24秒前
CodeCraft应助天草诺采纳,获得10
25秒前
爆米花应助贪玩的秋寒采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
徐yy完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
南洋发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
28秒前
深情安青应助憨憨采纳,获得30
28秒前
908328091完成签到,获得积分20
30秒前
科研通AI6.1应助FJLSDNMV采纳,获得10
30秒前
乔_发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
怡心亭发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
35秒前
小灰灰完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
happy完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
39秒前
晒晒太阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
sosososo完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
ahslyycky完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
邓金涛发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Various Faces of Animal Metaphor in English and Polish 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Photodetectors: From Ultraviolet to Infrared 500
Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging-based Radiomics Models for Predicting Liver Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 500
On the Dragon Seas, a sailor's adventures in the far east 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6348031
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8162873
关于积分的说明 17172090
捐赠科研通 5404292
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2861702
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1839457
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1688778