Replacement of Shaped Textured Implants with Round Smooth Implants in Breast Reconstruction: Long Term Patient- and Surgeon- Reported Outcomes

Background: The number of patients undergoing exchange of textured implants for smooth devices has greatly increased due to concern over BIA-ALCL. The authors examine long-term patient- and surgeon-reported outcomes in terms of aesthetics, comfort, and complications. Methods: Patients who underwent reconstruction with shaped, textured implants replaced with round, smooth implants between 1994-2022 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected using the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module as well as a survey evaluating aesthetics and comfort. Surgeon-reported outcomes included evaluation of aesthetics and capsular contracture. Results: 530 patients were reviewed, and 307 patients were included. Pairwise comparison of BREAST-Q data demonstrated psychosocial well-being (72.68 to 76.45; p=0.0075) and physical well-being (78.79 to 81.88; p=0.0078) significantly increased. Overall breast satisfaction (61.94 to 67.27; p=0.0082) and sexual well-being (53.89 to 57.98; p=0.0002) were also significantly higher in parallel with a clinically meaningful increase in BREAST-Q score of 5.33 and 4.09 points, respectively. Most patients felt they looked better (56.4%) or similar (27.3%) and were more comfortable (54.4%) or similar (39.4%) after the exchange procedure. The senior surgeon rated 40.1% of patients as a better aesthetic grade after replacement and 50.3% as the same. 36.8% of patients were rated as having a decrease in Baker capsular contracture grade. 2.9% of patients experienced a peri-operative complication and there were no reconstructive failures. Conclusion: Exchange of textured to smooth implants is safe, does not sacrifice aesthetic outcome, and provides a more comfortable and satisfactory outcome for patients with minimal complications.