Machine learning in female urinary incontinence: A scoping review

Introduction and Hypothesis The aim was to conduct a scoping review of the literature on the use of machine learning (ML) in female urinary incontinence (UI) over the last decade. Methods A systematic search was performed among the Medline, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science databases using the following keywords: [Urinary incontinence] and [(Machine learning) or (Predict) or (Prediction model)]. Eligible studies were considered to have applied ML model to explore different management processes of female UI. Data analyzed included the field of application, type of ML, input variables, and results of model validation. Results A total of 798 papers were identified while 23 finally met the inclusion criteria. The vast majority of studies applied logistic regression to establish models (91.3%, 21/23). Most frequently ML was applied to predict postpartum UI (39.1%, 9/23), followed by de novo incontinence after pelvic floor surgery (34.8%, 8/23).There are also three papers using ML models to predict treatment outcomes and three papers using ML models to assist in diagnosis. Variables for modeling included demographic characteristics, clinical data, pelvic floor ultrasound, and urodynamic parameters. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of these models fluctuated from 0.56 to 0.95, and only 11 studies reported sensitivity and specificity, with sensitivity ranging from 20% to 96.2% and specificity from 59.8% to 94.5%. Conclusion Machine learning modeling demonstrated good predictive and diagnostic abilities in some aspects of female UI, showing its promising prospects in near future. However, the lack of standardization and transparency in the validation and evaluation of the models, and the insufficient external validation greatly diminished the applicability and reproducibility, thus a focus on filling this gap is strongly recommended for future research.