Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Free Fibula Reconstruction of the Mandible: Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes with the Conventional Technique

Background: Pre-operative computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) revolutionized head and neck reconstruction after extirpative surgery. However, studies performing head-to-head comparison to the conventional technique have limited long-term follow-up. We aimed to compare short and long-term outcomes between conventional and CAD/CAM approaches for mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps. Methods: Patients undergoing free flap reconstruction from 2012 to 2021 were included. Data regarding patient demographics, past medical history, surgical details, complications, and reconstructive outcomes were collected. Patients who had CAD/CAM were compared with the patients who underwent reconstruction with the conventional technique. The cumulative incidence of hardware maintenance was displayed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 215 patients (n=79 conventional, n=136 CAD/CAM) were included. Both cohorts had similar demographics except the CAD/CAM cohort was younger (p=0.043). The mean operative duration was 54 minutes shorter with the use of CAD/CAM (p=0.014). Total and partial flap loss rates were similar. Patients with CAD/CAM had significantly lower rates of early wound dehiscence (p=0.037). Median [interquartile range] follow-up duration was similar (931 [1854] days in conventional vs 728 [841] days in CAD/CAM, p=0.084). After excluding patients with major surgical complications in the first 30-days, CAD/CAM cohort had a lower hardware removal rate (28.8% vs 13.9%, p=0.011). The significance persisted after including only the patients with more than 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion: The use of preoperative CAD/CAM may reduce operative duration, while allowing for longer maintenance of hardware with reduced removal rates due to complications.