Comparison of strategies for vascular ACCESS closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: the ACCESS-TAVI randomized trial

医学 止血 纤维接头 随机对照试验 外科 临床终点 置信区间 血管闭合器 内科学
作者
Tobias Rheude,Hendrik Ruge,Niklas Altaner,Costanza Pellegrini,Héctor Alvarez Covarrubias,N. Patrick Mayr,Salvatore Cassese,Sebastian Kufner,Yousuke Taniguchi,Christian Thilo,Markus Klos,Magdalena Erlebach,Simon Schneider,Martin Jurisic,Karl‐Ludwig Laugwitz,Rüdiger Lange,Heribert Schunkert,Adnan Kastrati,Markus Krane,Erion Xhepa
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:46 (7): 635-645 被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae784
摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data from randomized trials investigating different access closure strategies after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) remain scarce. In this study, two vascular closure device (VCD) strategies to achieve haemostasis after TF-TAVI were compared. METHODS: The ACCESS-TAVI (Comparison of Strategies for Vascular ACCESS Closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) is a prospective, multicentre trial in which patients undergoing TF-TAVI were randomly assigned to a strategy with a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy (suture/plug group) using one ProGlide™/ProStyle™ (Abbott Vascular) and one Angio-Seal® (Terumo) vs. a suture-based VCD strategy (suture-only group) using two ProGlides™/ProStyles™. The primary endpoint was a composite of major or minor access site-related vascular complications during index hospitalization according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. Key secondary endpoints included time to haemostasis, bleeding type ≥ 2, and all-cause mortality over 30 days. RESULTS: Between September 2022 and April 2024, 454 patients were randomized. The primary endpoint occurred in 27% (62/230) in the suture/plug group and 54% (121/224) in the suture-only group [relative risk .55 (95% confidence interval: .44, .68); P < .001]. Time to haemostasis was significantly shorter in the suture/plug group compared with the suture-only group (108 ± 208 s vs. 206 ± 171 s; P < .001). At 30 days, bleeding type ≥ 2 occurred less often in the suture/plug group compared with the suture-only group [6.2% vs. 12.1%, relative risk .66 (.43, 1.02); P = .032], with no significant difference in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to the composite of major or minor access site-related vascular complications, a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy was superior to a suture-based VCD strategy for vascular access closure in patients undergoing TF-TAVI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xixi发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
shilong.yang发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
David完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Hosea完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
无心的归尘完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
李洪卓发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
年轻金毛完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
宏哥完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
LWDYF完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
xixi完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
哭泣仇天发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
Hosea发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
灵巧嫣娆完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
YjHu应助自然的吐司采纳,获得30
10秒前
成就完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
成就发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
风中孤萍发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
生动的乐曲完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
虚拟的秋寒完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
丘比特应助生动的水瑶采纳,获得10
18秒前
WangDeLi发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
oliverrrr完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
ZF发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
mantaray发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
thezwt完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
youjiwuji完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
大模型应助阮小粒采纳,获得10
21秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 750
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7533533
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9119079
关于积分的说明 19480318
捐赠科研通 7133277
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3256979
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2424390
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2244665