医学
止血
纤维接头
随机对照试验
外科
临床终点
置信区间
血管闭合器
内科学
作者
Tobias Rheude,Hendrik Ruge,Niklas Altaner,Carlo Pellegrini,Héctor Alvarez Covarrubias,N Mayr,Salvatore Cassese,Sebastian Kufner,Yousuke Taniguchi,Christian Thilo,Markus Klos,Magdalena Erlebach,Simon Schneider,Martin Jurisic,Karl‐Ludwig Laugwitz,Rüdiger Lange,Heribert Schunkert,Adnan Kastrati,Markus Krane,Erion Xhepa,Aseel Alyaqoob
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae784
摘要
Abstract Background and Aims Data from randomized trials investigating different access closure strategies after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) remain scarce. In this study, two vascular closure device (VCD) strategies to achieve hemostasis after TF-TAVI were compared. Methods The ACCESS-TAVI (Comparison of Strategies for Vascular ACCESS Closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) is a prospective, multicenter trial in which patients undergoing TF-TAVI were randomly assigned to a strategy with a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy (suture/plug group) using one ProGlideTM/ProStyleTM (Abbott Vascular) and one Angio-Seal® (Terumo) versus a suture-based VCD strategy (suture-only group) using two ProGlidesTM/ProStylesTM. The primary endpoint was a composite of major or minor access site-related vascular complications during index hospitalization according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria. Key secondary endpoints included time to hemostasis, VARC-3 bleeding type ≥2 and all-cause mortality over 30 days. Results Between September 2022 and April 2024, 454 patients were randomized. The primary endpoint occurred in 27% (62/230) in the suture/plug group and 54% (121/224) in the suture-only group (relative risk [RR] 0.55 [95% confidence interval: 0.44;0.68]; p<0.001). Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in the suture/plug group compared to the suture-only group (108±208 s vs. 206±171 s; p <0.001). At 30 days, bleeding type ≥2 occurred less often in the suture/plug group compared to the sutureonly group (6.2% vs. 12.1%, RR 0.66 [0.43;1.02]; p=0.032), with no significant difference in mortality. Conclusions With regard to the composite of major or minor access-related vascular complications, a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy was superior to a suturebased VCD strategy for vascular access closure in patients undergoing TF-TAVI.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI