Comparison of strategies for vascular ACCESS closure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ACCESS-TAVI randomized trial

医学 止血 纤维接头 随机对照试验 外科 临床终点 置信区间 血管闭合器 内科学
作者
Tobias Rheude,Hendrik Ruge,Niklas Altaner,Carlo Pellegrini,Héctor Alvarez Covarrubias,N Mayr,Salvatore Cassese,Sebastian Kufner,Yousuke Taniguchi,Christian Thilo,Markus Klos,Magdalena Erlebach,Simon Schneider,Martin Jurisic,Karl‐Ludwig Laugwitz,Rüdiger Lange,Heribert Schunkert,Adnan Kastrati,Markus Krane,Erion Xhepa,Aseel Alyaqoob
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae784
摘要

Abstract Background and Aims Data from randomized trials investigating different access closure strategies after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) remain scarce. In this study, two vascular closure device (VCD) strategies to achieve hemostasis after TF-TAVI were compared. Methods The ACCESS-TAVI (Comparison of Strategies for Vascular ACCESS Closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) is a prospective, multicenter trial in which patients undergoing TF-TAVI were randomly assigned to a strategy with a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy (suture/plug group) using one ProGlideTM/ProStyleTM (Abbott Vascular) and one Angio-Seal® (Terumo) versus a suture-based VCD strategy (suture-only group) using two ProGlidesTM/ProStylesTM. The primary endpoint was a composite of major or minor access site-related vascular complications during index hospitalization according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria. Key secondary endpoints included time to hemostasis, VARC-3 bleeding type ≥2 and all-cause mortality over 30 days. Results Between September 2022 and April 2024, 454 patients were randomized. The primary endpoint occurred in 27% (62/230) in the suture/plug group and 54% (121/224) in the suture-only group (relative risk [RR] 0.55 [95% confidence interval: 0.44;0.68]; p<0.001). Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in the suture/plug group compared to the suture-only group (108±208 s vs. 206±171 s; p <0.001). At 30 days, bleeding type ≥2 occurred less often in the suture/plug group compared to the sutureonly group (6.2% vs. 12.1%, RR 0.66 [0.43;1.02]; p=0.032), with no significant difference in mortality. Conclusions With regard to the composite of major or minor access-related vascular complications, a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy was superior to a suturebased VCD strategy for vascular access closure in patients undergoing TF-TAVI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
AN发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
NIUBEN发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
古希腊掌管科研的神完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
6秒前
Nolan完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
m30发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
子车茗应助想住在火星上采纳,获得30
7秒前
ytl发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
十丶年完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
ff发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
笨笨完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
一三二五七完成签到,获得积分0
9秒前
万万想到了完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
鸣蜩十三完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
缓慢山柳完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
Steven完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
浅辰发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
樱桃儿完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
大模型应助狂野世立采纳,获得10
12秒前
聆风完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
朴素的书琴完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
科研通AI2S应助阳光的傲儿采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
LINGO发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
vivi先生完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
AFong完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
科目三应助zhu采纳,获得10
15秒前
小肥完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
LYchem发布了新的文献求助100
16秒前
17秒前
樱桃儿发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
ytl完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
高分求助中
Licensing Deals in Pharmaceuticals 2019-2024 3000
Cognitive Paradigms in Knowledge Organisation 2000
Effect of reactor temperature on FCC yield 2000
Introduction to Spectroscopic Ellipsometry of Thin Film Materials Instrumentation, Data Analysis, and Applications 1200
How Maoism Was Made: Reconstructing China, 1949-1965 800
Medical technology industry in China 600
ANSYS Workbench基础教程与实例详解 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3311876
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2944696
关于积分的说明 8520681
捐赠科研通 2620293
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1432756
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 664759
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 650064