成像体模
图像质量
医学
核医学
迭代重建
碘
图像噪声
扫描仪
神经组阅片室
算法
噪音(视频)
数学
放射科
人工智能
图像(数学)
计算机科学
材料科学
精神科
冶金
神经学
作者
Akiyo Fukutomi,Keitaro Sofue,Eisuke Ueshima,Noriyuki Negi,Yoshiko Ueno,Yushi Tsujita,Shinji Yabe,Takeru Yamaguchi,Ryuji Shimada,A. Kusaka,Masatoshi Hori,Takamichi Murakami
出处
期刊:European Radiology
[Springer Science+Business Media]
日期:2022-09-17
卷期号:33 (2): 1388-1399
被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00330-022-09127-1
摘要
To investigate the effect of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on the accuracy of iodine quantification and image quality of dual-energy CT (DECT) compared to that of other reconstruction algorithms in a phantom experiment and an abdominal clinical study.An elliptical phantom with five different iodine concentrations (1-12 mgI/mL) was imaged five times with fast-kilovoltage-switching DECT for three target volume CT dose indexes. All images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection, iterative reconstruction (two levels), and DLIR algorithms. Measured and nominal iodine concentrations were compared among the algorithms. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen with the same scanner was acquired in clinical patients. In arterial and portal venous phase images, iodine concentration, image noise, and coefficients of variation for four locations were retrospectively compared among the algorithms. One-way repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to evaluate differences in the iodine concentrations, standard deviations, coefficients of variation, and percentages of error among the algorithms.In the phantom study, the measured iodine concentrations were equivalent among the algorithms: within ± 8% of the nominal values, with root-mean-square deviations of 0.08-0.36 mgI/mL, regardless of radiation dose. In the clinical study (50 patients; 35 men; mean age, 68 ± 11 years), iodine concentrations were equivalent among the algorithms for each location (all p > .99). Image noise and coefficients of variation were lower with DLIR than with the other algorithms (all p < .01).The DLIR algorithm reduced image noise and variability of iodine concentration values compared with other reconstruction algorithms in the fast-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT.• In the phantom study, standard deviations and coefficients of variation in iodine quantification were lower on images with the deep learning image reconstruction algorithm than on those with other algorithms. • In the clinical study, iodine concentrations of measurement location in the upper abdomen were consistent across four reconstruction algorithms, while image noise and variability of iodine concentrations were lower on images with the deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI