氡
环境卫生
可归因风险
医学
肺癌
人口
相对风险
风险评估
系统回顾
人口学
梅德林
置信区间
肿瘤科
内科学
量子力学
计算机科学
物理
社会学
法学
计算机安全
政治学
作者
Lucía Martín-Gisbert,Alberto Ruano‐Raviña,Leonor Varela‐Lema,M.a Celia López Penabad,Alexandra Giraldo-Osorio,Cristina Candal‐Pedreira,Julia Rey-Brandariz,Nerea Mourino,Mónica Pérez‐Ríos
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41370-022-00506-w
摘要
After smoking, residential radon is the second risk factor of lung cancer in general population and the first in never-smokers. Previous studies have analyzed radon attributable lung cancer mortality for some countries. We aim to identify, summarize, and critically analyze the available data regarding the mortality burden of lung cancer due to radon, performing a quality assessment of the papers included, and comparing the results from different countries. We performed a systematic scoping review using the main biomedical databases. We included original studies with attributable mortality data related to radon exposure. We selected studies according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. PRISMA 2020 methodology and PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews requirements were followed. Data were abstracted using a standardized data sheet and a tailored scale was used to assess quality. We selected 24 studies describing radon attributable mortality derived from 14 different countries. Overall, 13 studies used risk models based on cohorts of miners, 8 used risks from residential radon case-control studies and 3 used both risk model options. Radon geometric mean concentration ranged from 11 to 83 Becquerels per cubic meter (Bq/m3) and the population attributable fraction (PAF) ranged from 0.2 to 26%. Studies performed in radon prone areas obtained the highest attributable mortality. High-quality publications reported PAF ranging from 3 to 12% for residential risk sources and from 7 to 25% for miner risk sources. Radon PAF for lung cancer mortality varies widely between studies. A large part of the variation is due to differences in the risk source used and the conceptual description of radon exposure assumed. A common methodology should be described and used from now on to improve the communication of these results.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI