医学
体绘制
渲染(计算机图形)
放射科
核医学
计算机图形学(图像)
计算机科学
作者
Lester Jay Wollschlaeger,Johannes Boos,Pascal Jungbluth,J. P. Grassmann,Christoph Schleich,David Latz,Patric Kroepil,Gerald Antoch,Joachim Windolf,Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108911
摘要
Abstract Purpose Cinematic rendering (CR), a recently launched, FDA-approved rendering technique converts CT image datasets into nearly photorealistic 3D reconstructions by using a unique lighting model. The purpose of this study was to compare CR to volume rendering technique (VRT) images in the preoperative visualization of multifragmentary intraarticular lower extremity fractures. Method In this retrospective study, CT datasets of 41 consecutive patients (female: n = 13; male: n = 28; mean age: 52.3 ± 17.9y) with multifragmentary intraarticular lower extremity fractures (calcaneus: n = 16; tibial pilon: n = 19; acetabulum: n = 6) were included. All datasets were acquired using a 128-row dual-source CT. A dedicated workstation was used to reconstruct CR and VRT images which were reviewed independently by two experienced board-certified traumatologists trained in special trauma surgery. Image quality, anatomical accuracy and fracture visualization were assessed on a 6-point-Likert-scale (1 = non-diagnostic; 6=excellent). The regular CT image reconstructions served as reverence standard. For each score, median values between both readers were calculated. Scores of both reconstruction methods were compared using a Wilcoxon-Ranksum test with p Results Compared to VRT, CR demonstrated a higher image quality (VRT:2.5; CR:6.0; p Conclusions CR reconstructions are superior to VRT due to higher image quality and higher anatomical accuracy. Traumatologists find CR reconstructions to improve visualization of lower extremity fractures which should thus be used for fracture demonstration during interdisciplinary conferences.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI