医学
头颈部癌
生活质量(医疗保健)
缓和医疗
置信区间
危险系数
癌症
介绍
临床终点
头颈部鳞状细胞癌
内科学
随机对照试验
放射治疗
全身疗法
性能状态
物理疗法
外科
护理部
家庭医学
乳腺癌
作者
Vijay Patil,Pankaj Singhai,Vanita Noronha,Atanu Bhattacharjee,Jayita Deodhar,Naveen Salins,Amit Joshi,Nandini Menon,Anuja Abhyankar,Ashwini Khake,Sachin Dhumal,Rupali Tambe,Mary Ann Muckaden,Kumar Prabhash
摘要
Abstract Background Early palliative care (EPC) is an important aspect of cancer management but, to our knowledge, has never been evaluated in patients with head and neck cancer. Hence, we performed this study to determine whether the addition of EPC to standard therapy leads to an improvement in the quality of life (QOL), decrease in symptom burden, and improvement in overall survival. Methods Adult patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region planned for palliative systemic therapy were allocated 1:1 to either standard systemic therapy without or with comprehensive EPC service referral. Patients were administered the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for head and neck cancer (FACT-H&N) questionnaire at baseline and every 1 month thereafter for 3 months. The primary endpoint was a change in the QOL measured at 3 months after random assignment. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Ninety patients were randomly assigned to each arm. There was no statistical difference in the change in the FACT-H&N total score (P = .94), FACT-H&N Trial Outcome Index (P = .95), FACT-general total (P = .84), and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale scores at 3 months between the 2 arms. The median overall survival was similar between the 2 arms (hazard ratio for death = 1.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.74 to 1.35). There were 5 in-hospital deaths in both arms (5.6% for both, P = .99). Conclusions In this phase III study, the integration of EPC in head and neck cancer patients did not lead to an improvement in the QOL or survival.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI