Severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab stratified by baseline eosinophil thresholds: a secondary analysis of the DREAM and MENSA studies

美波利祖马布 医学 嗜酸性粒细胞 哮喘 嗜酸性 基线(sea) 内科学 嗜酸性粒细胞增多症 病理 海洋学 地质学
作者
Héctor Ortega,Steven W. Yancey,Bhabita Mayer,Necdet B. Gunsoy,Oliver N. Keene,Eugene R. Bleecker,Christopher E. Brightling,Ian Pavord
出处
期刊:The Lancet Respiratory Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:4 (7): 549-556 被引量:533
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2213-2600(16)30031-5
摘要

Findings from previous studies showed that mepolizumab significantly reduces the rate of exacerbations in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. To assess the relationship between baseline blood eosinophil counts and efficacy of mepolizumab we did a secondary analysis of data from two studies, stratifying patients by different baseline blood eosinophil thresholds.We did a post-hoc analysis of data, which was completed on Sept 25, 2015, from two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of at least 32 weeks duration (NCT01000506 [DREAM] and NCT01691521 [MENSA]) done between 2009 and 2014. In these studies, mepolizumab (75 mg, 250 mg, or 750 mg intravenously; MENSA: 75 mg intravenously or 100 mg subcutaneously) versus placebo was given at 4-week intervals in addition to standard care (high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus ≥1 additional controller with or without daily oral corticosteroids) to patients aged 12 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, a history of at least two exacerbations in the previous year that required systemic corticosteroid treatment, and evidence of eosinophilic airway inflammation. The primary endpoint in both studies was the annual rate of clinically significant exacerbations (defined as worsening of asthma that required the use of systemic corticosteroids, or admission to hospital, or an emergency-room visit, or a combination of these occurrences). In our analysis, the primary outcome was the annualised rate of exacerbations in patients stratified by baseline eosinophil counts (≥150 cells per μL, ≥300 cells per μL, ≥400 cells per μL, and ≥500 cells per μL) and baseline blood eosinophil ranges (<150 cells per μL, ≥150 cells per μL to <300 cells per μL, ≥300 cells per μL to <500 cells per μL, and ≥500 cells per μL). We based our analysis on the intention-to-treat populations of the two original studies, and all mepolizumab doses were combined for analysis.Of 1192 patients, 846 received mepolizumab and 346 received placebo. The overall rate of mean exacerbations per person per year was reduced from 1·91 with placebo to 1·01 with mepolizumab (47% reduction; rate ratio [RR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·44-0·62; p<0·0001). The exacerbation rate reduction with mepolizumab versus placebo increased progressively from 52%; 0·48, 0·39-0·58) in patients with a baseline blood eosinophil count of at least 150 cells per μL to 70%; 0·30, 0·23-0·40]) in patients with a baseline count of at least 500 cells per μL. At a baseline count less than 150 cells per μL, predicted efficacy of mepolizumab was reduced.Our analysis has shown a close relationship between baseline blood eosinophil count and clinical efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and a history of exacerbations. We noted clinically relevant reductions in exacerbation frequency in patients with a count of 150 cells per μL or more at baseline. The use of this baseline biomarker will help to select patients who are likely to achieve important asthma outcomes with mepolizumab.GlaxoSmithKline.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
song发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
feizhuliu完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
Doctor Tang完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
south发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Saadiya发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
shui发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
xpf完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小二郎应助黄奥龙采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
安渝发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
滕遥发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
水泥酱完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
满意小丸子完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Zoey Young发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
逸晨发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
李爱国应助宛雷雅采纳,获得30
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
9秒前
10秒前
Emper发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
安静发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
wuhao完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
long4jun3发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
小至完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
旸羽完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
yaa发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
科目三应助田建设采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 880
Stop Talking About Wellbeing: A Pragmatic Approach to Teacher Workload 800
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
3rd Edition Group Dynamics in Exercise and Sport Psychology New Perspectives Edited By Mark R. Beauchamp, Mark Eys Copyright 2025 600
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
Terminologia Embryologica 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5618686
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4703697
关于积分的说明 14923247
捐赠科研通 4758321
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2550231
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1513010
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1474379