医学
再现性
双雷达
前列腺
核医学
磁共振成像
放射科
活检
机构审查委员会
乳房磁振造影
乳房成像
多参数磁共振成像
乳腺摄影术
外科
内科学
癌症
乳腺癌
统计
数学
作者
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz,Luke A. Ginocchio,Daniel Cornfeld,Adam T. Froemming,Rajan T. Gupta,Barış Türkbey,Antonio C. Westphalen,James S. Babb,Daniel Margolis
出处
期刊:Radiology
[Radiological Society of North America]
日期:2016-04-01
卷期号:280 (3): 793-804
被引量:437
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.2016152542
摘要
Purpose To determine the interobserver reproducibility of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 lexicon. Materials and Methods This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board–approved. Six radiologists from six separate institutions, all experienced in prostate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, assessed prostate MR imaging examinations performed at a single center by using the PI-RADS lexicon. Readers were provided screen captures that denoted the location of one specific lesion per case. Analysis entailed two sessions (40 and 80 examinations per session) and an intersession training period for individualized feedback and group discussion. Percent agreement (fraction of pairwise reader combinations with concordant readings) was compared between sessions. κ coefficients were computed. Results No substantial difference in interobserver agreement was observed between sessions, and the sessions were subsequently pooled. Agreement for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater was 0.593 in peripheral zone (PZ) and 0.509 in transition zone (TZ). In PZ, reproducibility was moderate to substantial for features related to diffusion-weighted imaging (κ = 0.535–0.619); fair to moderate for features related to dynamic contrast material–enhanced (DCE) imaging (κ = 0.266–0.439); and fair for definite extraprostatic extension on T2-weighted images (κ = 0.289). In TZ, reproducibility for features related to lesion texture and margins on T2-weighted images ranged from 0.136 (moderately hypointense) to 0.529 (encapsulation). Among 63 lesions that underwent targeted biopsy, classification as PI-RADS score of 4 or greater by a majority of readers yielded tumor with a Gleason score of 3+4 or greater in 45.9% (17 of 37), without missing any tumor with a Gleason score of 3+4 or greater. Conclusion Experienced radiologists achieved moderate reproducibility for PI-RADS version 2, and neither required nor benefitted from a training session. Agreement tended to be better in PZ than TZ, although was weak for DCE in PZ. The findings may help guide future PI-RADS lexicon updates. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI