Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.

梅德林 医学 心理信息 患者安全 系统回顾 观察研究 医疗保健 最佳实践 更安全的 医学文献 医疗急救 家庭医学 护理部 病理 经济 管理 经济增长 法学 计算机科学 计算机安全 政治学
作者
Kaveh G Shojania,B. Duncan,Kimberly McDonald,Robert M. Wachter,Amy J. Markowitz
出处
期刊:PubMed [National Institutes of Health]
卷期号: (43): i-668 被引量:1500
链接
标识
摘要

Patient safety has received increased attention in recent years, but mostly with a focus on the epidemiology of errors and adverse events, rather than on practices that reduce such events. This project aimed to collect and critically review the existing evidence on practices relevant to improving patient safety.Patient safety practices were defined as those that reduce the risk of adverse events related to exposure to medical care across a range of diagnoses or conditions. Potential patient safety practices were identified based on preliminary surveys of the literature and expert consultation. This process resulted in the identification of 79 practices for review. The practices focused primarily on hospitalized patients, but some involved nursing home or ambulatory patients. Protocols specified the inclusion criteria for studies and the structure for evaluation of the evidence regarding each practice. Pertinent studies were identified using various bibliographic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ABI/INFORM, INSPEC), targeted searches of the Internet, and communication with relevant experts.Included literature consisted of controlled observational studies, clinical trials and systematic reviews found in the peer-reviewed medical literature, relevant non-health care literature and "gray literature." For most practices, the project team required that the primary outcome consist of a clinical endpoint (i.e., some measure of morbidity or mortality) or a surrogate outcome with a clear connection to patient morbidity or mortality. This criterion was relaxed for some practices drawn from the non-health care literature. The evidence supporting each practice was summarized using a prospectively determined format. The project team then used a predefined consensus technique to rank the practices according to the strength of evidence presented in practice summaries. A separate ranking was developed for research priorities.Practices with the strongest supporting evidence are generally clinical interventions that decrease the risks associated with hospitalization, critical care, or surgery. Many patient safety practices drawn primarily from nonmedical fields (e.g., use of simulators, bar coding, computerized physician order entry, crew resource management) deserve additional research to elucidate their value in the health care environment. The following 11 practices were rated most highly in terms of strength of the evidence supporting more widespread implementation. Appropriate use of prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients at risk; Use of perioperative beta-blockers in appropriate patients to prevent perioperative morbidity and mortality; Use of maximum sterile barriers while placing central intravenous catheters to prevent infections; Appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients to prevent postoperative infections; Asking that patients recall and restate what they have been told during the informed consent process; Continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions (CASS) to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia; Use of pressure relieving bedding materials to prevent pressure ulcers; Use of real-time ultrasound guidance during central line insertion to prevent complications; Patient self-management for warfarin (Coumadin) to achieve appropriate outpatient anticoagulation and prevent complications; Appropriate provision of nutrition, with a particular emphasis on early enteral nutrition in critically ill and surgical patients; and Use of antibiotic-impregnated central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related infections.An evidence-based approach can help identify practices that are likely to improve patient safety. Such practices target a diverse array of safety problems. Further research is needed to fill the substantial gaps in the evidentiary base, particularly with regard to the generalizability of patient safety practices heretofore tested only in limited settings and to promising practices drawn from industries outside of health care.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Eurus完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
youth应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
好吃完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
youth应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
Whisper发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
灰灰发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科研通AI6.2应助火山书痴采纳,获得30
6秒前
执着思山完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
9秒前
gg完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
执着思山发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
QQ发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
W10发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
完美世界应助涛涛采纳,获得10
15秒前
QQ完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
科研通AI6.3应助火山书痴采纳,获得30
16秒前
16秒前
zhuangzhuang发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
可爱的函函应助wewe采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
2026年中国辛酸癸酸聚乙二醇甘油酯行业市场现状调查及投资机会研判报告 1000
2026年中国辛酸癸酸聚乙二醇甘油酯行业市场规模及竞争格局分析报告 1000
48V Low-voltage Power Distribution Network (PDN) Architecture Industry Report, 2024 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
适配Micro-LED色转换的高兼容性量子点负性光刻胶制备与工艺研究 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7316591
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8932569
关于积分的说明 18935921
捐赠科研通 6976610
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3214049
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2382025
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2192798