Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.

梅德林 医学 心理信息 患者安全 系统回顾 观察研究 医疗保健 最佳实践 更安全的 医学文献 医疗急救 家庭医学 护理部 病理 经济 管理 经济增长 法学 计算机科学 计算机安全 政治学
作者
Kaveh G Shojania,B. Duncan,Kimberly McDonald,Robert M. Wachter,Amy J. Markowitz
出处
期刊:PubMed [National Institutes of Health]
卷期号: (43): i-668 被引量:1500
链接
标识
摘要

Patient safety has received increased attention in recent years, but mostly with a focus on the epidemiology of errors and adverse events, rather than on practices that reduce such events. This project aimed to collect and critically review the existing evidence on practices relevant to improving patient safety.Patient safety practices were defined as those that reduce the risk of adverse events related to exposure to medical care across a range of diagnoses or conditions. Potential patient safety practices were identified based on preliminary surveys of the literature and expert consultation. This process resulted in the identification of 79 practices for review. The practices focused primarily on hospitalized patients, but some involved nursing home or ambulatory patients. Protocols specified the inclusion criteria for studies and the structure for evaluation of the evidence regarding each practice. Pertinent studies were identified using various bibliographic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ABI/INFORM, INSPEC), targeted searches of the Internet, and communication with relevant experts.Included literature consisted of controlled observational studies, clinical trials and systematic reviews found in the peer-reviewed medical literature, relevant non-health care literature and "gray literature." For most practices, the project team required that the primary outcome consist of a clinical endpoint (i.e., some measure of morbidity or mortality) or a surrogate outcome with a clear connection to patient morbidity or mortality. This criterion was relaxed for some practices drawn from the non-health care literature. The evidence supporting each practice was summarized using a prospectively determined format. The project team then used a predefined consensus technique to rank the practices according to the strength of evidence presented in practice summaries. A separate ranking was developed for research priorities.Practices with the strongest supporting evidence are generally clinical interventions that decrease the risks associated with hospitalization, critical care, or surgery. Many patient safety practices drawn primarily from nonmedical fields (e.g., use of simulators, bar coding, computerized physician order entry, crew resource management) deserve additional research to elucidate their value in the health care environment. The following 11 practices were rated most highly in terms of strength of the evidence supporting more widespread implementation. Appropriate use of prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients at risk; Use of perioperative beta-blockers in appropriate patients to prevent perioperative morbidity and mortality; Use of maximum sterile barriers while placing central intravenous catheters to prevent infections; Appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients to prevent postoperative infections; Asking that patients recall and restate what they have been told during the informed consent process; Continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions (CASS) to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia; Use of pressure relieving bedding materials to prevent pressure ulcers; Use of real-time ultrasound guidance during central line insertion to prevent complications; Patient self-management for warfarin (Coumadin) to achieve appropriate outpatient anticoagulation and prevent complications; Appropriate provision of nutrition, with a particular emphasis on early enteral nutrition in critically ill and surgical patients; and Use of antibiotic-impregnated central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related infections.An evidence-based approach can help identify practices that are likely to improve patient safety. Such practices target a diverse array of safety problems. Further research is needed to fill the substantial gaps in the evidentiary base, particularly with regard to the generalizability of patient safety practices heretofore tested only in limited settings and to promising practices drawn from industries outside of health care.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
bajiuc完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
木又发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
糖糖发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
广广逛光咣完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
东子应助Lee采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研通AI6.3应助一步一步采纳,获得10
4秒前
11关闭了11文献求助
5秒前
成就南晴发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
molihuakai应助JackBear采纳,获得10
5秒前
荔枝柚子发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
wy发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
凶狠的土豆丝完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
summer夏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
居居子发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
雨醉东风完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
火锅完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
三毛完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
文文武完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Harry完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
酷炫念寒完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高高的哈密瓜完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
豆豆完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
干净忆秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
wia完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
荔枝柚子完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
osolemioo完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
cpuczy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
steph完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
笑点低的云朵完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
糖糖完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
GSQ完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
李宏梅完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
PEI1025发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 2500
Roms fliessende Grenzen : Archäologische Landesausstellung Nordrhein-Westfalen 1000
Atlas of Aligner Treatment and Planning A Case-Based Approach 1000
Geist der Kunst und Kultur 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7425966
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9028956
关于积分的说明 19233500
捐赠科研通 7054358
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3235716
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2399179
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2218307