Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.

梅德林 医学 心理信息 患者安全 系统回顾 观察研究 医疗保健 最佳实践 更安全的 医学文献 医疗急救 家庭医学 护理部 病理 经济 管理 经济增长 法学 计算机科学 计算机安全 政治学
作者
Kaveh G Shojania,B. Duncan,Kimberly McDonald,Robert M. Wachter,Amy J. Markowitz
出处
期刊:PubMed [National Institutes of Health]
卷期号: (43): i-668 被引量:1500
链接
标识
摘要

Patient safety has received increased attention in recent years, but mostly with a focus on the epidemiology of errors and adverse events, rather than on practices that reduce such events. This project aimed to collect and critically review the existing evidence on practices relevant to improving patient safety.Patient safety practices were defined as those that reduce the risk of adverse events related to exposure to medical care across a range of diagnoses or conditions. Potential patient safety practices were identified based on preliminary surveys of the literature and expert consultation. This process resulted in the identification of 79 practices for review. The practices focused primarily on hospitalized patients, but some involved nursing home or ambulatory patients. Protocols specified the inclusion criteria for studies and the structure for evaluation of the evidence regarding each practice. Pertinent studies were identified using various bibliographic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ABI/INFORM, INSPEC), targeted searches of the Internet, and communication with relevant experts.Included literature consisted of controlled observational studies, clinical trials and systematic reviews found in the peer-reviewed medical literature, relevant non-health care literature and "gray literature." For most practices, the project team required that the primary outcome consist of a clinical endpoint (i.e., some measure of morbidity or mortality) or a surrogate outcome with a clear connection to patient morbidity or mortality. This criterion was relaxed for some practices drawn from the non-health care literature. The evidence supporting each practice was summarized using a prospectively determined format. The project team then used a predefined consensus technique to rank the practices according to the strength of evidence presented in practice summaries. A separate ranking was developed for research priorities.Practices with the strongest supporting evidence are generally clinical interventions that decrease the risks associated with hospitalization, critical care, or surgery. Many patient safety practices drawn primarily from nonmedical fields (e.g., use of simulators, bar coding, computerized physician order entry, crew resource management) deserve additional research to elucidate their value in the health care environment. The following 11 practices were rated most highly in terms of strength of the evidence supporting more widespread implementation. Appropriate use of prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients at risk; Use of perioperative beta-blockers in appropriate patients to prevent perioperative morbidity and mortality; Use of maximum sterile barriers while placing central intravenous catheters to prevent infections; Appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients to prevent postoperative infections; Asking that patients recall and restate what they have been told during the informed consent process; Continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions (CASS) to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia; Use of pressure relieving bedding materials to prevent pressure ulcers; Use of real-time ultrasound guidance during central line insertion to prevent complications; Patient self-management for warfarin (Coumadin) to achieve appropriate outpatient anticoagulation and prevent complications; Appropriate provision of nutrition, with a particular emphasis on early enteral nutrition in critically ill and surgical patients; and Use of antibiotic-impregnated central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related infections.An evidence-based approach can help identify practices that are likely to improve patient safety. Such practices target a diverse array of safety problems. Further research is needed to fill the substantial gaps in the evidentiary base, particularly with regard to the generalizability of patient safety practices heretofore tested only in limited settings and to promising practices drawn from industries outside of health care.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
充电宝应助nanana采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
小猪完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xing_xing应助dududu采纳,获得20
1秒前
2秒前
lixinglei应助dududu采纳,获得20
2秒前
隐形曼青应助kylin采纳,获得10
2秒前
小c_发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
源源完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
半邪完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
冷傲的荟完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
fanfanfan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小猪发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
搜集达人应助shuguolei采纳,获得10
5秒前
libai发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
从容绮彤发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
所所应助咫尺采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
无聊的黎发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
曜曜发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
充电宝应助suiyi采纳,获得10
9秒前
tx应助Ryan采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
spolo发布了新的文献求助50
12秒前
大模型应助zhiyin你太美采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
ASDq完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
尤里有气完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
任白993发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
杜明智发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
离殇完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Orange应助齐润森采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Health and Wellbeing for Babies and Children 800
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7546211
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9129682
关于积分的说明 19505076
捐赠科研通 7140683
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3259275
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2426306
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2247578