Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.

梅德林 医学 心理信息 患者安全 系统回顾 观察研究 医疗保健 最佳实践 更安全的 医学文献 医疗急救 家庭医学 护理部 病理 经济 管理 经济增长 法学 计算机科学 计算机安全 政治学
作者
Kaveh G Shojania,B. Duncan,Kimberly McDonald,Robert M. Wachter,Amy J. Markowitz
出处
期刊:PubMed 卷期号: (43): i-668 被引量:1500
链接
标识
摘要

Patient safety has received increased attention in recent years, but mostly with a focus on the epidemiology of errors and adverse events, rather than on practices that reduce such events. This project aimed to collect and critically review the existing evidence on practices relevant to improving patient safety.Patient safety practices were defined as those that reduce the risk of adverse events related to exposure to medical care across a range of diagnoses or conditions. Potential patient safety practices were identified based on preliminary surveys of the literature and expert consultation. This process resulted in the identification of 79 practices for review. The practices focused primarily on hospitalized patients, but some involved nursing home or ambulatory patients. Protocols specified the inclusion criteria for studies and the structure for evaluation of the evidence regarding each practice. Pertinent studies were identified using various bibliographic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ABI/INFORM, INSPEC), targeted searches of the Internet, and communication with relevant experts.Included literature consisted of controlled observational studies, clinical trials and systematic reviews found in the peer-reviewed medical literature, relevant non-health care literature and "gray literature." For most practices, the project team required that the primary outcome consist of a clinical endpoint (i.e., some measure of morbidity or mortality) or a surrogate outcome with a clear connection to patient morbidity or mortality. This criterion was relaxed for some practices drawn from the non-health care literature. The evidence supporting each practice was summarized using a prospectively determined format. The project team then used a predefined consensus technique to rank the practices according to the strength of evidence presented in practice summaries. A separate ranking was developed for research priorities.Practices with the strongest supporting evidence are generally clinical interventions that decrease the risks associated with hospitalization, critical care, or surgery. Many patient safety practices drawn primarily from nonmedical fields (e.g., use of simulators, bar coding, computerized physician order entry, crew resource management) deserve additional research to elucidate their value in the health care environment. The following 11 practices were rated most highly in terms of strength of the evidence supporting more widespread implementation. Appropriate use of prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients at risk; Use of perioperative beta-blockers in appropriate patients to prevent perioperative morbidity and mortality; Use of maximum sterile barriers while placing central intravenous catheters to prevent infections; Appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients to prevent postoperative infections; Asking that patients recall and restate what they have been told during the informed consent process; Continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions (CASS) to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia; Use of pressure relieving bedding materials to prevent pressure ulcers; Use of real-time ultrasound guidance during central line insertion to prevent complications; Patient self-management for warfarin (Coumadin) to achieve appropriate outpatient anticoagulation and prevent complications; Appropriate provision of nutrition, with a particular emphasis on early enteral nutrition in critically ill and surgical patients; and Use of antibiotic-impregnated central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related infections.An evidence-based approach can help identify practices that are likely to improve patient safety. Such practices target a diverse array of safety problems. Further research is needed to fill the substantial gaps in the evidentiary base, particularly with regard to the generalizability of patient safety practices heretofore tested only in limited settings and to promising practices drawn from industries outside of health care.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
漂亮土豆完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
Tink完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
友好大树完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
深情安青应助XXF采纳,获得10
2秒前
竹有节完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
细心的老头完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
拼搏新筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助超级无di色采纳,获得30
4秒前
Akim应助怀忑采纳,获得10
5秒前
852应助不吃橘子采纳,获得10
5秒前
明芬发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
奋斗绿旋发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
dery完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
竹有节关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
puyuanting完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
小心翼翼发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
winnie完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
12秒前
13秒前
SYLH应助12采纳,获得10
13秒前
komorebi发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Wowyx发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
不吃橘子发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
li完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
落日余晖发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
小心翼翼完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
怀忑发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
XXF发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
huangdashi完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
传奇3应助hongw1980采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 3: Products and Risk Management 600
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 2: Term Structure Models 600
Virulence Mechanisms of Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3554391
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3130250
关于积分的说明 9385569
捐赠科研通 2829495
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1555557
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 726111
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 715446