医学
原发性头痛
偏头痛
荟萃分析
现存分类群
适度
一致性(知识库)
临床心理学
精神科
心理学
内科学
社会心理学
几何学
数学
进化生物学
生物
作者
A. Brooke Walters,Rachel Davis-Martin,Timothy T. Houle,Dana P. Turner,Todd A. Smitherman
出处
期刊:Cephalalgia
[SAGE]
日期:2017-08-20
卷期号:38 (6): 1188-1198
被引量:180
标识
DOI:10.1177/0333102417727535
摘要
Objective To quantitatively synthesize extant literature on perceived triggers of primary headache disorders. Methods A meta-analytic review of headache trigger survey studies was conducted. Endorsement rates, assessment method, and headache and sample characteristics were extracted from included articles. Separate random-effects models were used to assess trigger endorsement rates and post-hoc meta-regressions examined potential moderator variables. Results 85 articles from 1958 to 2015 were included, involving 27,122 participants and querying 420 unique triggers (collapsed into 15 categories). Four-fifths (0.81; 95% CI .75 to .86) of individuals with migraine or tension-type headache endorsed at least one trigger. Rates increased with the number of categories queried (OR: 1.18, 1.08–1.30) and year of publication (OR: 1.04, 1.00–1.08). The triggers most commonly endorsed were stress (.58, .53–.63) and sleep (.41, .36–.47). Conclusions Extreme heterogeneity characterizes the headache trigger literature. Most individuals with a primary headache disorder perceive their attacks to be triggered by one or more precipitants, the most common of which are stress and sleep. However, trigger endorsement is influenced by method of assessment. Enhancing methodological consistency and prioritizing experimental studies would improve our understanding of headache triggers.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI