随机对照试验
跳跃的
医学
伤害预防
背包
毒物控制
航空医学
物理疗法
干预(咨询)
急诊医学
外科
工程类
精神科
生理学
结构工程
病理
作者
Robert W. Yeh,Linda R. Valsdottir,Michael W. Yeh,Changyu Shen,Daniel B. Kramer,Jordan B. Strom,Eric A. Secemsky,Joanne L. Healy,Robert M. Domeier,Dhruv S. Kazi,Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
出处
期刊:BMJ
[BMJ]
日期:2018-12-13
卷期号:: k5094-k5094
被引量:123
摘要
To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major traumatic injury when jumping from an aircraft.Randomized controlled trial.Private or commercial aircraft between September 2017 and August 2018.92 aircraft passengers aged 18 and over were screened for participation. 23 agreed to be enrolled and were randomized.Jumping from an aircraft (airplane or helicopter) with a parachute versus an empty backpack (unblinded).Composite of death or major traumatic injury (defined by an Injury Severity Score over 15) upon impact with the ground measured immediately after landing.Parachute use did not significantly reduce death or major injury (0% for parachute v 0% for control; P>0.9). This finding was consistent across multiple subgroups. Compared with individuals screened but not enrolled, participants included in the study were on aircraft at significantly lower altitude (mean of 0.6 m for participants v mean of 9146 m for non-participants; P<0.001) and lower velocity (mean of 0 km/h v mean of 800 km/h; P<0.001).Parachute use did not reduce death or major traumatic injury when jumping from aircraft in the first randomized evaluation of this intervention. However, the trial was only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground, suggesting cautious extrapolation to high altitude jumps. When beliefs regarding the effectiveness of an intervention exist in the community, randomized trials might selectively enroll individuals with a lower perceived likelihood of benefit, thus diminishing the applicability of the results to clinical practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI