Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial

随机对照试验 跳跃的 医学 伤害预防 背包 毒物控制 航空医学 物理疗法 干预(咨询) 急诊医学 外科 工程类 精神科 生理学 结构工程 病理
作者
Robert W. Yeh,Linda R. Valsdottir,Michael W. Yeh,Changyu Shen,Daniel B. Kramer,Jordan B. Strom,Eric A. Secemsky,Joanne L. Healy,Robert M. Domeier,Dhruv S. Kazi,Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
出处
期刊:BMJ [BMJ]
卷期号:: k5094-k5094 被引量:123
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.k5094
摘要

To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major traumatic injury when jumping from an aircraft.Randomized controlled trial.Private or commercial aircraft between September 2017 and August 2018.92 aircraft passengers aged 18 and over were screened for participation. 23 agreed to be enrolled and were randomized.Jumping from an aircraft (airplane or helicopter) with a parachute versus an empty backpack (unblinded).Composite of death or major traumatic injury (defined by an Injury Severity Score over 15) upon impact with the ground measured immediately after landing.Parachute use did not significantly reduce death or major injury (0% for parachute v 0% for control; P>0.9). This finding was consistent across multiple subgroups. Compared with individuals screened but not enrolled, participants included in the study were on aircraft at significantly lower altitude (mean of 0.6 m for participants v mean of 9146 m for non-participants; P<0.001) and lower velocity (mean of 0 km/h v mean of 800 km/h; P<0.001).Parachute use did not reduce death or major traumatic injury when jumping from aircraft in the first randomized evaluation of this intervention. However, the trial was only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground, suggesting cautious extrapolation to high altitude jumps. When beliefs regarding the effectiveness of an intervention exist in the community, randomized trials might selectively enroll individuals with a lower perceived likelihood of benefit, thus diminishing the applicability of the results to clinical practice.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
今后应助Jack采纳,获得30
刚刚
世博君完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
pandary完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
搜集达人应助zf采纳,获得10
5秒前
tico完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
依依发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
sun秦发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
樱田妮妮大佬完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
牙牙乐发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
沉静鹭洋完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
木鱼发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
贪玩思枫完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
蓝莓橘子酱应助呆萌语梦采纳,获得10
8秒前
蓝莓橘子酱应助呆萌语梦采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI6.1应助呆萌语梦采纳,获得30
8秒前
8秒前
Jack发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.3应助ccc采纳,获得10
9秒前
mmmm发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
科研通AI6.3应助学习采纳,获得10
9秒前
Lll完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
小石头发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
标致荷花完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
16328发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
13秒前
王意博完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
inRe发布了新的文献求助100
13秒前
赵十一发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 1500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6010340
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7554604
关于积分的说明 16133215
捐赠科研通 5156938
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2762145
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1740690
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1633397