Effectiveness of surgical interventions for treating de Quervain's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 随机对照试验 心理干预 荟萃分析 物理疗法 系统回顾 外科 梅德林 循证医学 优势比 内科学 替代医学 病理 法学 政治学 精神科
作者
Sitthiphong Suwannaphisit,Chaiwat Chuaychoosakoon
出处
期刊:Annals of medicine and surgery [Wolters Kluwer]
卷期号:77 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103620
摘要

This systematic review of randomized controlled trials was undertaken to assess whether any of the various currently used surgical interventions have better functional outcomes and less impairment or fewer surgical complications compared to the other common surgical interventions in de Quervain's disease.Relevant studies related to surgical interventions in de Quervain's disease based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were identified from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials comparing surgical interventions in de Quervain's disease published from January 2000 to December 2020. Functional outcome and impairment were the primary outcomes assessed.Three trials met the eligibility criteria which were following randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental trial enrolling adults ≥18 years of age diagnosed with de Quervain's disease, comparing clinical outcomes between different surgical interventions, and including functional outcomes, impairment, pain and complications data. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and GRADE approach were used to ascertain methodological quality. Statistical heterogeneity was tested with I-square and chi-square tests. The longitudinal skin incision probably slightly reduced superficial radial nerve injury, vein injury, scar hypertrophy, and total complications compared with the transverse skin incision with relative risk: 0.14, very low certainty by GRADE; 0.10, very low certainty by GRADE; 0.57, very low certainty by GRADE; and 0.23, very low certainty by GRADE, respectively.Concerning the analysis of functional and pain scores, no significant results were able to be concluded. This study's findings must be considered in the light of quality and sample size limitations, and further high quality prospective randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to draw more firm conclusions.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
情怀应助如意枫叶采纳,获得10
刚刚
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Akim应助SS采纳,获得10
3秒前
张雷应助清新的夜蕾采纳,获得20
3秒前
chennn发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
罗一完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
丘比特应助wu采纳,获得10
10秒前
俏皮芷蕊发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
称心的菲鹰完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
碧蓝问安发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
打打应助ZZZ采纳,获得10
14秒前
18秒前
呆萌板凳发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
hp关闭了hp文献求助
19秒前
20秒前
都选C完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
壮观以松完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Liufgui应助郭小宝采纳,获得20
21秒前
heli完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
如意枫叶发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
都选C发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
英俊的铭应助淡烟流水采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
Miracle完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
32秒前
wu发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
忧心的听双完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
Timon完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
深情安青应助Miracle采纳,获得10
34秒前
李健应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
34秒前
kingwill应助Harlotte采纳,获得60
34秒前
张雯思发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
西瓜刀发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
寒冷的发箍完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
37秒前
37秒前
38秒前
wu完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989242
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531393
关于积分的说明 11253753
捐赠科研通 3270010
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804868
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882084
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809136