Effectiveness of surgical interventions for treating de Quervain's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 随机对照试验 心理干预 荟萃分析 物理疗法 系统回顾 外科 梅德林 循证医学 优势比 内科学 替代医学 病理 法学 政治学 精神科
作者
Sitthiphong Suwannaphisit,Chaiwat Chuaychoosakoon
出处
期刊:Annals of medicine and surgery [Wolters Kluwer]
卷期号:77 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103620
摘要

This systematic review of randomized controlled trials was undertaken to assess whether any of the various currently used surgical interventions have better functional outcomes and less impairment or fewer surgical complications compared to the other common surgical interventions in de Quervain's disease.Relevant studies related to surgical interventions in de Quervain's disease based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were identified from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials comparing surgical interventions in de Quervain's disease published from January 2000 to December 2020. Functional outcome and impairment were the primary outcomes assessed.Three trials met the eligibility criteria which were following randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental trial enrolling adults ≥18 years of age diagnosed with de Quervain's disease, comparing clinical outcomes between different surgical interventions, and including functional outcomes, impairment, pain and complications data. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and GRADE approach were used to ascertain methodological quality. Statistical heterogeneity was tested with I-square and chi-square tests. The longitudinal skin incision probably slightly reduced superficial radial nerve injury, vein injury, scar hypertrophy, and total complications compared with the transverse skin incision with relative risk: 0.14, very low certainty by GRADE; 0.10, very low certainty by GRADE; 0.57, very low certainty by GRADE; and 0.23, very low certainty by GRADE, respectively.Concerning the analysis of functional and pain scores, no significant results were able to be concluded. This study's findings must be considered in the light of quality and sample size limitations, and further high quality prospective randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to draw more firm conclusions.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
少言完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
kiko完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
隐形惜筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
黑眼圈完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
又又妈妈完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
欢呼的丁真完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
ty发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Faded完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
ding应助Amorfati采纳,获得10
15秒前
好好学习天天向上完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
所所应助lh采纳,获得10
17秒前
李爱国应助深情丸子采纳,获得10
17秒前
烟花应助阿湫采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
乌梅不乌发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
YY完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
Tiam发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
种花家的狗狗完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
wisdom完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
温暖芸完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
认真的觅松完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
bkagyin应助12采纳,获得10
23秒前
gougoutu发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
老菜鸟321发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
完美世界应助温暖芸采纳,获得10
24秒前
贺贺发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
旧辞发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
JamesPei应助乌梅不乌采纳,获得10
25秒前
Amorfati发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
咕噜噜完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
lzhgoashore发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
Research on Disturbance Rejection Control Algorithm for Aerial Operation Robots 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038524
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3576221
关于积分的说明 11374737
捐赠科研通 3305912
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819354
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892688
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815048