亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Validation of the OSCAR 2 oscillometric 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the International Protocol for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices

医学 血压 动态血压 血压计 回廊的 舒张期 心脏病学 内科学
作者
Stephen C. Jones,Mary Bilous,Sue Winship,Paul Finn,James Goodwin
出处
期刊:Blood Pressure Monitoring [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:9 (4): 219-223 被引量:97
标识
DOI:10.1097/00126097-200408000-00007
摘要

Objectives The accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices is of prime importance and should be validated before devices are used clinically. We carried out an independent evaluation of the OSCAR 2 oscillometric ambulatory blood pressure monitor (SunTech Medical model 222) according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Methods Adult subjects were recruited from patients and staff at The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK. Nine sequential same-arm blood pressure measurements were taken alternating between simultaneous readings by two independent, trained observers using mercury sphygmomanometers and the device operated by a third observer. In phase one, 15 subjects participated (five in each of the low, medium and high blood pressure ranges) with 18 subjects participating in phase two. Data from 33 subjects (11 in each of the three blood pressure ranges) were analysed for systolic (19 male, 14 female, mean age 56.0 years) and for diastolic (17 male, 16 female, mean age 51.1 years) blood pressure. Results The OSCAR 2 passed the first phase of the validation process. In phase 2.1, the OSCAR 2 monitor had 71 readings within 5 mmHg, 86 within 10 mmHg and 94 within 15 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 72 readings within 5 mmHg, 88 within 10 mmHg and 96 within 15 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Mean (±SD) differences between observers and device were 0.9±2.3 mmHg for SBP and −0.5±2.3 mmHg for DBP. In phase 2, 24 subjects had at least two of the differences within 5 mmHg and three subjects had no differences within 5 mmHg for SBP while for DBP 25 subjects had at least two of the differences within 5 mmHg and two subjects had no differences within 5 mmHg. Conclusions The OSCAR 2 passes all requirements for validation by the International Protocol and can be recommended for clinical use in an adult population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
旧残月发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
JamesPei应助无情的觅双采纳,获得10
3秒前
橡皮鱼发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
坦率的语芙完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
葛力完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
13秒前
JING发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
28秒前
朝槿完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
橡皮鱼发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
领导范儿应助科研民工李采纳,获得10
39秒前
YaoZhang完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
53秒前
Lynth_iota完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
落叶捎来讯息完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
庞喜存v发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
静静发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
九灶发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
DPH完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
JING完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
小马甲应助旧残月采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
整齐的不评完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
Aquarius发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
科研通AI6.3应助sakkaku采纳,获得10
2分钟前
yizhikeyangou完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6021043
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7625834
关于积分的说明 16165958
捐赠科研通 5168768
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2766152
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1748732
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1636221