Validation of the OSCAR 2 oscillometric 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the International Protocol for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices

医学 血压 动态血压 血压计 回廊的 舒张期 心脏病学 内科学
作者
Stephen C. Jones,Mary Bilous,Sue Winship,Paul Finn,James Goodwin
出处
期刊:Blood Pressure Monitoring [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:9 (4): 219-223 被引量:97
标识
DOI:10.1097/00126097-200408000-00007
摘要

Objectives The accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices is of prime importance and should be validated before devices are used clinically. We carried out an independent evaluation of the OSCAR 2 oscillometric ambulatory blood pressure monitor (SunTech Medical model 222) according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Methods Adult subjects were recruited from patients and staff at The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK. Nine sequential same-arm blood pressure measurements were taken alternating between simultaneous readings by two independent, trained observers using mercury sphygmomanometers and the device operated by a third observer. In phase one, 15 subjects participated (five in each of the low, medium and high blood pressure ranges) with 18 subjects participating in phase two. Data from 33 subjects (11 in each of the three blood pressure ranges) were analysed for systolic (19 male, 14 female, mean age 56.0 years) and for diastolic (17 male, 16 female, mean age 51.1 years) blood pressure. Results The OSCAR 2 passed the first phase of the validation process. In phase 2.1, the OSCAR 2 monitor had 71 readings within 5 mmHg, 86 within 10 mmHg and 94 within 15 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 72 readings within 5 mmHg, 88 within 10 mmHg and 96 within 15 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Mean (±SD) differences between observers and device were 0.9±2.3 mmHg for SBP and −0.5±2.3 mmHg for DBP. In phase 2, 24 subjects had at least two of the differences within 5 mmHg and three subjects had no differences within 5 mmHg for SBP while for DBP 25 subjects had at least two of the differences within 5 mmHg and two subjects had no differences within 5 mmHg. Conclusions The OSCAR 2 passes all requirements for validation by the International Protocol and can be recommended for clinical use in an adult population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
YZ应助平常安采纳,获得10
1秒前
鲸鱼完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
汉堡包应助张宁采纳,获得10
3秒前
奋进的熊完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
韩钰小宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
msp发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
lala完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
缥缈飞鸟完成签到 ,获得积分20
11秒前
暂时想不到昵称完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
完美世界应助低调点的采纳,获得10
12秒前
ding应助善良的过客采纳,获得10
12秒前
15389050279发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
18秒前
19秒前
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
毛舒敏完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
dde发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
25秒前
25秒前
26秒前
xunanlei发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
28秒前
Shmilykk应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
28秒前
28秒前
28秒前
28秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Various Faces of Animal Metaphor in English and Polish 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
Mass participant sport event brand associations: an analysis of two event categories 500
Photodetectors: From Ultraviolet to Infrared 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6354742
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8169924
关于积分的说明 17198263
捐赠科研通 5410744
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2864128
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1841629
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1690086