清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: Low fidelity may explain negative findings

经皮神经电刺激 忠诚 医学 心理干预 系统回顾 慢性疼痛 物理医学与康复 梅德林 物理疗法 计算机科学 替代医学 精神科 病理 电信 政治学 法学
作者
Michael J. Bennett,Nicola Hughes,Mark H. Johnson
出处
期刊:Pain [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:152 (6): 1226-1232 被引量:88
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.009
摘要

The benefits of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief have not been reliably established, as most systematic reviews find poor methodological quality in many studies. The paradox within the evidence base for TENS is that despite identified sources of bias that may lead to an overestimation of treatment effects, no benefits for TENS can be clearly demonstrated. Conventional assessments of quality assume a single direction of bias, and little work has been undertaken examining other directions of bias. Our hypothesis was that low fidelity in studies (bias leading to an underestimation of treatment effects) may account for inconclusive findings. We included 38 studies from 3 recently published Cochrane systematic reviews that examined TENS for acute, chronic, and cancer pain. We extracted data relating to treatment allocation, application of TENS and to the assessment of outcomes. We quantified these data and judged this against standardised assessment criteria using a “traffic light” approach based on the number of studies reaching the standard. We identified significant sources of potential bias in both directions in relation to study design and implementation fidelity that have not been quantified previously. Suboptimal dosing of TENS and inappropriate outcome assessment were particularly prevalent weaknesses indicating low fidelity. We propose criteria for judging directions of bias in future studies of TENS that may be adapted to assess other trials in which implementation fidelity is important, such as other nonpharmacological interventions for pain. Poor implementation fidelity was identified as a significant source of bias in systematic reviews of TENS studies and might explain lack of consistent treatment effects of TENS in pain. Here, criteria for assessing methodology are proposed for use in designing future clinical trials of TENS.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
情怀应助yaoliwen采纳,获得10
1秒前
Kair完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
richard1357完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
少年完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
35秒前
yaoliwen完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
宇文非笑完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
yaoliwen发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
老狗砸完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
ewind完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助帮帮我好吗采纳,获得10
1分钟前
小马甲应助无限的老九采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科目三应助皮老师采纳,获得50
1分钟前
Shadow完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
飞云完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
王kk完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
香蕉觅云应助春华秋实采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Fred Guan完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
深情的凝云完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
轻松的飞阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
FashionBoy应助xun采纳,获得10
2分钟前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Sunny完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
诗蕊完成签到 ,获得积分0
3分钟前
Driscoll完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
高高代珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
wangeil007完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
途啊哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
WYnini完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
空2完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
双眼皮跳蚤完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
小王同学完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
安然完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
xun发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
科研搬运工完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
wyh295352318完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
春华秋实发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
春华秋实完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Defense against predation 800
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3137039
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2788014
关于积分的说明 7784284
捐赠科研通 2444088
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1299724
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625522
版权声明 600999