Federal Funding and Citation Metrics of Biomedical Research in the USA

引用 斯科普斯 赠款 生物医学 图书馆学 政治学 科学网 梅德林 医学 公共行政 计算机科学 法学 生物信息学 生物
作者
John P. A. Ioannidis,Iztok Hozo,Benjamin Djulbegović
出处
期刊:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory - medRxiv
标识
DOI:10.1101/2022.08.31.22279467
摘要

ABSTRACT Both citation and funding metrics converge in shaping current perceptions of academic success. We aimed to evaluate what proportion of the most-cited USA-based biomedical scientists are funded by biomedical federal agencies and whether funded scientists are more cited than not funded ones. We linked a Scopus-based database on top-cited researchers (n=75,316 USA-based) and the NIH RePORTER database of 33 biomedical federal agencies (n=204,603 grant records) with matching based on name and institution. The 40,887 USA-based top-cited scientists who were allocated to any of 69 scientific subfields highly related to biomedicine were considered in the main analysis. The proportion of USA-based top-cited biomedical scientists (based on career-long citation impact) who had received any federal funding from biomedical research agencies was 63% for any funding (1996-2022), 21% for recent funding (2015-2022), and 14% for current funding (2021-2022). Respective proportions were 65%, 31%, and 21%, when top-cited scientists based on recent single year impact were considered. There was large variability across scientific subfields. No subfield had more than 31% of its top-cited USA-based scientists (career-long impact) currently funded. Funded top-cited researchers were overall more cited than non-funded top-cited scientists, e.g. mean (median) 14,420 (8983) versus 8,445 (4613) (p<0.001) and a substantial difference remained (, after adjusting for subfield and years since first publication. Differences were more prominent in some specific biomedical subfields. Overall, biomedical federal funding has offered support to approximately two-thirds of the top-cited biomedical scientists at some point during the last quarter century, but only a small minority of top-cited scientists have current federal biomedical funding. The large unevenness across subfields needs to be addressed with ways that improve equity, efficiency, excellence, and translational potential.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Alex-Song完成签到 ,获得积分0
刚刚
zombleq完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
aleilei完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
hhh发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
一条摆摆的沙丁鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
hhh完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
麻辣烫完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
搬砖的化学男完成签到 ,获得积分0
24秒前
开放素完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
LXx完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
wakaka123完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Microgan完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
mechefy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
迅速的念芹完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
wll1091完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
善良紫完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
怕孤独的飞飞完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
roundtree完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助xn201120采纳,获得10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
alexlpb完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
candy6663339完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
研友_西门孤晴完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Bella完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
美丽觅夏完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
淡淡菠萝完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
青山完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
唠叨的天亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
云下完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
邵123456789发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
Owen应助称心的高丽采纳,获得30
2分钟前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3976735
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3520831
关于积分的说明 11204873
捐赠科研通 3257630
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798814
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877897
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806663