Federal Funding and Citation Metrics of Biomedical Research in the USA

引用 斯科普斯 赠款 生物医学 图书馆学 政治学 科学网 梅德林 医学 公共行政 计算机科学 法学 生物信息学 生物
作者
John P. A. Ioannidis,Iztok Hozo,Benjamin Djulbegović
出处
期刊:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory - medRxiv
标识
DOI:10.1101/2022.08.31.22279467
摘要

ABSTRACT Both citation and funding metrics converge in shaping current perceptions of academic success. We aimed to evaluate what proportion of the most-cited USA-based biomedical scientists are funded by biomedical federal agencies and whether funded scientists are more cited than not funded ones. We linked a Scopus-based database on top-cited researchers (n=75,316 USA-based) and the NIH RePORTER database of 33 biomedical federal agencies (n=204,603 grant records) with matching based on name and institution. The 40,887 USA-based top-cited scientists who were allocated to any of 69 scientific subfields highly related to biomedicine were considered in the main analysis. The proportion of USA-based top-cited biomedical scientists (based on career-long citation impact) who had received any federal funding from biomedical research agencies was 63% for any funding (1996-2022), 21% for recent funding (2015-2022), and 14% for current funding (2021-2022). Respective proportions were 65%, 31%, and 21%, when top-cited scientists based on recent single year impact were considered. There was large variability across scientific subfields. No subfield had more than 31% of its top-cited USA-based scientists (career-long impact) currently funded. Funded top-cited researchers were overall more cited than non-funded top-cited scientists, e.g. mean (median) 14,420 (8983) versus 8,445 (4613) (p<0.001) and a substantial difference remained (, after adjusting for subfield and years since first publication. Differences were more prominent in some specific biomedical subfields. Overall, biomedical federal funding has offered support to approximately two-thirds of the top-cited biomedical scientists at some point during the last quarter century, but only a small minority of top-cited scientists have current federal biomedical funding. The large unevenness across subfields needs to be addressed with ways that improve equity, efficiency, excellence, and translational potential.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
天外飞聪发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
自行输入昵称完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
duckspy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
怕黑紫伊发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
benzene完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
Qsss发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
gaogao完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
kk子发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
Lucas应助SSE采纳,获得10
9秒前
范范发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
我爱吃菜完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
赎罪完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Qsss完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
ya发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
练得身形似鹤形完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
鹿港猫妖完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
chen完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
阿湫发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
崔悦欣发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助kk子采纳,获得10
19秒前
丰富的不惜完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
票子发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
华仔应助魏莱采纳,获得10
21秒前
F123发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
shen发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
Research on Disturbance Rejection Control Algorithm for Aerial Operation Robots 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038446
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3576149
关于积分的说明 11374627
捐赠科研通 3305875
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819354
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892680
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815048