Federal Funding and Citation Metrics of Biomedical Research in the USA

引用 斯科普斯 赠款 生物医学 图书馆学 政治学 科学网 梅德林 医学 公共行政 计算机科学 法学 生物信息学 生物
作者
John P. A. Ioannidis,Iztok Hozo,Benjamin Djulbegović
出处
期刊:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory - medRxiv
标识
DOI:10.1101/2022.08.31.22279467
摘要

ABSTRACT Both citation and funding metrics converge in shaping current perceptions of academic success. We aimed to evaluate what proportion of the most-cited USA-based biomedical scientists are funded by biomedical federal agencies and whether funded scientists are more cited than not funded ones. We linked a Scopus-based database on top-cited researchers (n=75,316 USA-based) and the NIH RePORTER database of 33 biomedical federal agencies (n=204,603 grant records) with matching based on name and institution. The 40,887 USA-based top-cited scientists who were allocated to any of 69 scientific subfields highly related to biomedicine were considered in the main analysis. The proportion of USA-based top-cited biomedical scientists (based on career-long citation impact) who had received any federal funding from biomedical research agencies was 63% for any funding (1996-2022), 21% for recent funding (2015-2022), and 14% for current funding (2021-2022). Respective proportions were 65%, 31%, and 21%, when top-cited scientists based on recent single year impact were considered. There was large variability across scientific subfields. No subfield had more than 31% of its top-cited USA-based scientists (career-long impact) currently funded. Funded top-cited researchers were overall more cited than non-funded top-cited scientists, e.g. mean (median) 14,420 (8983) versus 8,445 (4613) (p<0.001) and a substantial difference remained (, after adjusting for subfield and years since first publication. Differences were more prominent in some specific biomedical subfields. Overall, biomedical federal funding has offered support to approximately two-thirds of the top-cited biomedical scientists at some point during the last quarter century, but only a small minority of top-cited scientists have current federal biomedical funding. The large unevenness across subfields needs to be addressed with ways that improve equity, efficiency, excellence, and translational potential.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
lzf发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Cindy发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
guo发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
星辰大海应助鳄鱼蛋采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
暗栀发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
彭于晏应助shinn采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
乐乐应助17采纳,获得10
5秒前
Ava应助hjz采纳,获得10
6秒前
文静的听荷完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
hdbys发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
ding应助迷路的初柔采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
guo完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
8秒前
感动的红酒完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
上官听白发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
老10完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
远荒发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
yaoxuer发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Cindy完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
星之守护者完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
ggggglllll完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
yz发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
nostalgia发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
研友_08ozgZ完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
沉默诗柳完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
欧科狗完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
诚心的冰棍完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3969398
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3514239
关于积分的说明 11173064
捐赠科研通 3249531
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1794934
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 875501
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804827