290. RISK OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: COMPARISON BETWEEN SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY AND GASTRIC BYPASS AT 10 YEARS, A NATIONWIDE STUDY

医学 袖状胃切除术 倾向得分匹配 外科 比例危险模型 食管癌 癌症 胃切除术 队列 格尔德 回流 内科学 疾病 减肥 胃分流术 肥胖
作者
Caroline Gronnier,Tigran Poghosyan,Andrea Lazzati
出处
期刊:Diseases of The Esophagus [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:36 (Supplement_2)
标识
DOI:10.1093/dote/doad052.120
摘要

Abstract Backgroud The risk of esophageal cancer after bariatric surgery is a matter of debate. Several studies have reported that bariatric surgery patients have a lower risk of cancer. However, esophageal cancer is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease, which may increase after bariatric surgery and in particular after sleeve gastrectomy. Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate the risk of esophageal cancer after two bariatric procedures: sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (GBP). Methods Data from patients operated on for bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2020 in France were extracted from a national discharge database (PMSI). Adult patients operated on for SG or GBP were included and followed up until December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to the procedure initially performed. The endpoints were the occurrence of esophageal and cardia cancers. To assess the effect of the type of bariatric procedure on the development of cancer, a multivariate analysis was performed using a marginal Cox model after matching on propensity score (PS). In the sensitivity analysis, we used different models: standard Cox regression, Cox regression adjusted on propensity score, and Cox model with adjustment for inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results Of the 367,169 patients included, 68.7% were SGs and 31.3% were GBPs. The two groups differed at inclusion in terms of age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities. Median follow-up was 6.0 years (IQR 3.0–8.0 years) for the entire cohort, and approximately 35,000 patients were followed for at least 10 years. A total of 88 esophageal cancers were identified, including 64 after SG and 24 after GBP. In multivariate analysis, no significant difference was found between SG and GBP on cancer incidence (HR 1.6, 95%CI 0.9–2.7, p = 0.09 for OS versus GBP). No differences were found in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion In this large national cohort of bariatric surgery patients, no significant differences were found in the incidence of esophageal and cardia cancer between OS and GBP.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zhangz完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
跳跃太清完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
花朝唯完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
doclarrin完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
jbear完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
回首不再是少年完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
芃123发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
focco发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Smoiy完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
wsl完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
30秒前
33秒前
兜兜揣满糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
诗亭发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
乘风破浪完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
Slemon发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
扶光完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
Jiang_wencai完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
focco完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
刻苦的新烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
白桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
陈无敌完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
kanong完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
璐璐完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
月亮完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Slemon完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
1分钟前
kk发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
徒玦完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
跳跃的白云完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
吴邪完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
zhangguo完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
舒心小猫咪完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
诗亭完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
闪电完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
仔仔不吃肉肉完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
文静灵阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
清脆愫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Handbook of Fuel Cells, 6 Volume Set 1666
求助这个网站里的问题集 1000
Floxuridine; Third Edition 1000
Tracking and Data Fusion: A Handbook of Algorithms 1000
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 800
消化器内視鏡関連の偶発症に関する第7回全国調査報告2019〜2021年までの3年間 500
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 内科学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 冶金 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2864830
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2471244
关于积分的说明 6699329
捐赠科研通 2160726
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1147837
版权声明 585404
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 563834