Accuracy and surface roughness of Co-Cr partial denture frameworks with different digital fabrication methods

Statement of problem Traditional removable partial denture (RPD) manufacture is being phased out in favor of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques and rapid prototyping (RP), which provide more efficient methods of producing RPD frameworks. However, studies comparing the accuracy and surface roughness of these approaches on RPD frameworks are still scarce. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy and surface roughness of class I cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) removable partial denture frameworks digitally constructed using 2 different CAD-CAM technologies: direct milling (DM) and selective laser melting (SLM). Material and methods An educational maxillary stone cast was scanned to create a resin model after rest seat preparation. The resin model was scanned, and an RPD framework was digitally designed. Sixteen frameworks were constructed (n=8). Two groups were defined. In the direct milling (DM) group, the standard tessellation language (STL) file of the RPD framework was used to mill the design from a Co-Cr blank directly. In the selective laser melting (SLM) group, the STL file of the RPD framework was used to print the design from Co-Cr powder using the selective laser melting technique. Geomagic Control X software program was used to measure the accuracy of the fabricated frameworks. Surface roughness was tested using optical profilometry. An unpaired t test was used to compare the 2 groups (α=.05). Results The DM group showed significantly higher mean ±standard deviation accuracy (189 ±9 µm) (P<.001) compared with the SLM group (456 ±122 µm). Regarding the surface roughness, the DM group (0.157 ±0.001 mm) showed significantly lower surface roughness (P<.001) compared with the SLM group (0.256 ±0.001 mm). Conclusions The direct milling fabrication technique enabled the fabrication of Co-Cr RPD frameworks with higher accuracy and less surface roughness when compared with the 3-dimensionally printed SLM technique.