Comparison of diagnostic potential of shear wave elastography between breast mass lesions and non–mass–like lesions

BackgroundShear wave elastography (SWE) can improve the specificity of B-mode ultrasound (US) without reducing the sensitivity for breast cancer diagnosis. Existing research on SWE includes both mass lesions and non‑mass‑like (NML) lesions or only NML lesions; however, there are no studies comparing the diagnostic potential of SWE in the detection of mass and NML lesions in the same trial.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of SWE in detecting mass lesions and NML lesions and determine the different individualised thresholds of the SWE parameters according to the lesion type.MethodsThis Study included 623 breast lesions of 562 consecutive women, who were scheduled for conventional US and SWE between January 2021 and December 2021. The diagnostic performances of conventional US and each quantitative SWE parameter (maximum elastic modulus [Emax], mean elastic modulus [Emean], and elastic modulus standard deviation [Esd]) were assessed. Histological diagnosis for all Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) category 4/5 patients and some BI-RADS category 3 patients and the follow-up results of other BI-RADS category 3 patients were used as the reference standard.ResultsIn this study, 281 benign lesions and 342 malignant lesions were identified. The diagnostic performance of conventional US and SWE was better in the mass lesion group than in the NML lesion group. Every SWE parameter had a different threshold in each group, and the thresholds of the SWE parameters were higher in the mass lesion group than in the NML lesion group. In the mass lesion group, Esd had the highest Az value, whereas in the NML lesion group, Emax had the highest Az value. In both the mass and NML lesion groups, the diagnostic specificity of the combination of conventional US and SWE was significantly higher than that of conventional US alone (P < 0.05), without a significantly decrease in the diagnostic sensitivity.ConclusionsSWE could increase the confidence of breast ultrasound diagnosis, especially for NML lesions. NML lesions had lower thresholds of SWE parameters than did the mass lesions.