Pitfalls in the interpretation of blood tests used to assess and monitor micronutrient nutrition status

Abstract Assessment of micronutrient (MN) status is of particular importance in patients who require medical nutrition therapy, especially those requiring parenteral nutrition. Blood testing is generally the only tool available in clinical settings to assess MN status. However, using plasma or serum concentration faces pitfalls mainly because of the impact of inflammation that diverts the MNs from the circulating compartment. This review aims to review the blood tests that are useful and provide information about how to integrate functional markers of status to reach a clinically relevant diagnosis. Most impacted, with a significant and proportional decrease in plasma concentrations, are iron, selenium, zinc, thiamin, folic acid, cobalamin, and vitamins A, C, and D; copper is the only MN for which the plasma concentration increases. Therefore, a surrogate marker of inflammation, C‐reactive protein, must always be determined simultaneously. Validated intracellular and functional tests are proposed to improve status assessment. A protocol is suggested for tests required both on commencing and during nutrition support. A timely turnaround of analysis is essential for results to be clinically useful. In some cases, the appropriate provision of MNs should be commenced before results have been obtained to confirm the clinical assessment. Laboratory tests of MN status are an area prone to misuse and misinterpretation. The appropriate use and interpretation of such tests are essential to ensure the correct management of nutrition problems.