Reducing the risk of transfusion‐transmitted cytomegalovirus infection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

白细胞减少 医学 荟萃分析 置信区间 相对风险 内科学 巨细胞病毒 子群分析 输血 免疫学 人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV) 病毒性疾病 疱疹病毒科
作者
Maria Mainou,Fares Alahdab,Aaron A.R. Tobian,Noor Asi,Khaled Mohammed,M. Hassan Murad,Brenda J. Grossman
出处
期刊:Transfusion [Wiley]
卷期号:56 (6pt2): 1569-1580 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.1111/trf.13478
摘要

BACKGROUND Leukoreduced (LR) or cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐seronegative cellular blood components are commonly used to reduce the risk of transfusion‐transmitted CMV infection in high‐risk patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the evidence for the use of LR cellular blood components with or without concurrent CMV testing of donor units in patients undergoing chemotherapy or solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, in pregnant women, in very‐low‐birthweight infants, and in patients with primary immunodeficiency. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus from 1980 through February 2015. Studies were included if they had a comparison group. Two independent reviewers selected and appraised studies. Meta‐analysis was performed when appropriate. RESULTS Of 457 studies screened, 11 were eligible. One study was excluded from the meta‐analysis because the comparison performed differed significantly from the others. Meta‐analysis of five studies that compared leukoreduction to transfusing CMV‐untested blood components showed no significant difference in clinical CMV infection (relative risk [RR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04‐1.57) or laboratory CMV infection (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.08‐1.37). Meta‐analysis of three studies that compared leukoreduction to transfusing CMV‐seronegative cellular components showed no significant difference in laboratory CMV infection (RR, 2.18; 95% CI, 0.96‐4.98). Meta‐analysis of two studies that compared adding CMV testing to leukoreduction (vs. leukoreduction alone) showed no significant difference in clinical or laboratory CMV infection. The certainty in estimates was low for all comparisons. CONCLUSION At present, the scientific evidence does not favor a single strategy for reducing the risk of transfusion‐related CMV infection in high‐risk patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
安桥完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
xiaolu完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
JiaYY完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
愉快的夏柳完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
linjiaxin发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
qqq发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
MHB完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
充电宝应助伏坎采纳,获得10
6秒前
ding应助复杂棒球采纳,获得10
6秒前
不想干活应助寒江雪采纳,获得10
7秒前
初亦非完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
jianhan发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI6应助高贵紫丝采纳,获得10
7秒前
muye完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
卷王完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
知识都进脑袋里了完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
wdd发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
12秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
linkman应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
12秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
12秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
12秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得100
12秒前
典雅碧空应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
网络安全 SEMI 标准 ( SEMI E187, SEMI E188 and SEMI E191.) 1000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Stackable Smart Footwear Rack Using Infrared Sensor 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4608502
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4015039
关于积分的说明 12432049
捐赠科研通 3696238
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2037918
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1071004
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 954900