学生参与度
心理学
情感(语言学)
任务(项目管理)
理解力
小组工作
课程
联想(心理学)
班级(哲学)
认知
数学教育
协作学习
教育学
计算机科学
沟通
工程类
程序设计语言
系统工程
神经科学
心理治疗师
人工智能
作者
Joshua W. Reid,Zübeyde Demet Kırbulut,Shaghayegh Fateh,Adan Fatima,Michael Macrie-Shuck,Hannah T. Nennig,Fabrizzio Quintanilla,Nicole E States,Ahmad Syed,Renée S. Cole,Gregory T. Rushton,Lisa Shah,Vicente Talanquer
出处
期刊:Chemistry Education. Research and Practice
[The Royal Society of Chemistry]
日期:2022-01-01
卷期号:23 (1): 173-188
被引量:9
摘要
Several studies have highlighted the positive effects that active learning may have on student engagement and performance. However, the influence of active learning strategies is mediated by several factors, including the nature of the learning environment and the cognitive level of in-class tasks. These factors can affect different dimensions of student engagement such as the nature of social processing in student groups, how knowledge is used and elaborated upon by students during in-class tasks, and the amount of student participation in group activities. In this study involving four universities in the US, we explored the association between these different dimensions of student engagement and the cognitive level of assigned tasks in five distinct general chemistry learning environments where students were engaged in group activities in diverse ways. Our analysis revealed a significant association between task level and student engagement. Retrieval tasks often led to a significantly higher number of instances of no interaction between students and individualistic work, and a lower number of knowledge construction and collaborative episodes with full student participation. Analysis tasks, on the other hand, were significantly linked to more instances of knowledge construction and collaboration with full group participation. Tasks at the comprehension level were distinctive in their association with more instances of knowledge application and multiple types of social processing. The results of our study suggest that other factors such as the nature of the curriculum, task timing, and class setting may also affect student engagement during group work.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI