Single Institution Experience with Afirma and Thyroseq Testing in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Background: Thyroid nodules are a very common often incidental finding on physical examination or imaging. Of those who undergo fine needle aspiration, cytology is indeterminate in up to 15%. Molecular testing is increasingly being used to help identify which nodules may be high risk for malignancy and guide management with regard to clinical follow-up or surgical intervention. Recently there has been an increase in publication of independent studies assessing the performance of these molecular tests and comparing "real-world" data with the validation studies. Methods: This retrospective study identified all thyroid nodules at our institution that had Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC), genomic sequencing classifier (GSC), or Thyroseq v3 molecular testing from January 2014 to January 2020 and compared measurements of test performance between them at our institution, and then with the original validation studies and other published institutional data. Results: Overall, the benign call rate was highest in the Afirma GSC group (78%) compared with the GEC group (60%) and Thyroseq group (66%). Surgical histopathology revealed malignancy in 6 of 31of biopsied nodules in the GEC group, 8 of 13 in the GSC group, and 3 of 16 in the Thyroseq v3 group. Based on our data, the GSC specificity (73.7%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (61.5%) were higher than the GEC specificity (60.4%) and PPV (22.2%) as well as Thyroseq v3 specificity (55.2%) and PPV (18.8%). Conclusions: From our short-term institutional experience, we found that the GSC classified more cytologically indeterminate nodules as benign compared with the Afirma GEC, and had improved specificity and PPV, which is similar to the validation study and other institutions' reported experiences. We also found that the Thyroseq v3 was similar to the Afirma GEC in terms of specificity and PPV, both of which are much lower than the validation studies.