医学
引产
米索前列醇
催产素
随机对照试验
产科
引产
妇科
妇产科学
毕肖普分数
怀孕
前列腺素E2
球囊导管
气球
流产
子宫颈
外科
内科学
癌症
生物
遗传学
作者
Janesh Gupta,Baev O.R. Baev,Jorge Duro Gómez,Charles Garabédian,L Hellmeyer,Rhona Mahony,J. Königbauer,Antonı́n Pařı́zek,V.E. Radzinsky,Jan Stener Jørgensen,Ulla Britt Wennerholm,Gian Carlo Di Renzo
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.023
摘要
In recent years, numerous studies have been conducted, which have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of using mechanical methods for the induction of labor with an unfavorable Bishop Score (BS ≤ 6). Mechanical methods work by stimulating the endogenous production of prostaglandins (PG) by stretching the amnio-chorionic membranes and myometrial cells. Balloon or osmotic dilators for cervical ripening and induction?European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyVol. 269PreviewInduction of labor is probably the intervention most studied by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs in pregnancy [1]. The options are many (e.g. balloon catheter, osmotic dilators, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), misoprostol, oxytocin, etc), and the RCTs and meta-analyses of RCTs comparing them so many that the clinician can get lost in a sea of studies [1,2]. Full-Text PDF
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI