医学
麻醉
术后认知功能障碍
荟萃分析
随机对照试验
恶心
术后恶心呕吐
全身麻醉
入射(几何)
发作性谵妄
相对风险
谵妄
外科
内科学
置信区间
认知
七氟醚
重症监护医学
物理
光学
精神科
作者
I‐Chia Teng,Cheuk‐Kwan Sun,Chun‐Ning Ho,Li‐Kai Wang,Yao‐Tsung Lin,Ying-Jen Chang,Jen‐Yin Chen,Chin‐Chen Chu,Chung‐Hsi Hsing,Kuo‐Chuan Hung
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101119
摘要
To investigate the efficacy of combined epidural anaesthesia/analgesia (EAA) against postoperative delirium/cognitive dysfunction (POD/POCD) in adults after major non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia (GA).The databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Cochrane Central Register were searched from inception to November 2021 for available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the impact of EAA on risk of POD/POCD. The primary outcome was risk of POD/POCD, while the secondary outcomes comprised postoperative pain score, length of hospital stay (LOS), risk of complications, and postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV).Meta-analysis of eight studies with a total of 2376 patients (EAA group: 1189 patients; non-EAA group: 1187 patients) revealed no difference in risk of POD/POCD between the EAA and the non-EAA groups [Risk ratio (RR): 0.68; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.13, p = 0.14, I2 = 73%], but the certainty of evidence was very low. Nevertheless, the EAA group had lower pain score at postoperative 24 h [mean difference (MD): -1.49, 95% CI: -2.38 to -0.61; I2 = 98%; five RCTs; n = 476] and risk of PONV (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.93, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%; three RCTs, 1876 patients) than those in the non-EAA group. Our results showed no significant impact of EAA on the pain score at postoperative 36-72 h, LOS, and risk of complications.This meta-analysis demonstrated that EAA had no significant impact on the incidence of POD/POCD in patients following non-cardiac surgery.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI