Probiotics in Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

医学 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 相对风险 内科学 机械通风 安慰剂 肺炎 合生元 梅德林 呼吸机相关性肺炎 置信区间 重症监护医学 替代医学 益生菌 病理 生物 细菌 政治学 法学 遗传学
作者
Sameer Sharif,Alisha Greer,Clarissa Skorupski,Hao Qin,Jennie Johnstone,Joanna C. Dionne,Vincent Lau,William Manzanares,Mohamed Eltorki,Erick Duan,François Lauzier,John C. Marshall,Diane Heels‐Ansdell,Lehana Thabane,Deborah J. Cook,Bram Rochwerg
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:50 (8): 1175-1186 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005580
摘要

To determine the safety and efficacy of probiotics or synbiotics on morbidity and mortality in critically ill adults and children.We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and unpublished sources from inception to May 4, 2021.We performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared enteral probiotics or synbiotics to placebo or no treatment in critically ill patients. We screened studies independently and in duplicate.Independent reviewers extracted data in duplicate. A random-effects model was used to pool data. We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome using the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.Sixty-five RCTs enrolled 8,483 patients. Probiotics may reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (relative risk [RR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89 and risk difference [RD], 6.9% reduction; 95% CI, 2.7-10.2% fewer; low certainty), healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP) (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; RD, 5.5% reduction; 95% CI, 8.2-2.0% fewer; low certainty), ICU length of stay (LOS) (mean difference [MD], 1.38 days fewer; 95% CI, 0.57-2.19 d fewer; low certainty), hospital LOS (MD, 2.21 d fewer; 95% CI, 1.18-3.24 d fewer; low certainty), and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (MD, 2.53 d fewer; 95% CI, 1.31-3.74 d fewer; low certainty). Probiotics probably have no effect on mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87-1.04 and RD, 1.1% reduction; 95% CI, 2.8% reduction to 0.8% increase; moderate certainty). Post hoc sensitivity analyses without high risk of bias studies negated the effect of probiotics on VAP, HAP, and hospital LOS.Low certainty RCT evidence suggests that probiotics or synbiotics during critical illness may reduce VAP, HAP, ICU and hospital LOS but probably have no effect on mortality.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
爱学习的小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
拼搏笑阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
共享精神应助我不吃葱采纳,获得10
3秒前
eno完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
天天快乐应助张成采纳,获得10
5秒前
qio一眼完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
斯文败类应助tutu采纳,获得10
7秒前
杨成发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
汉堡包应助菠萝吹雪采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
SciGPT应助日富一日采纳,获得20
9秒前
YH完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
苏卿应助sisisij采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
修仙应助wst采纳,获得10
11秒前
geg完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
今后应助ch采纳,获得10
11秒前
honey完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
MM完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
杨洋发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
min完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
ISSN 2159-8274 EISSN 2159-8290 1000
Becoming: An Introduction to Jung's Concept of Individuation 600
Distribution Dependent Stochastic Differential Equations 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3159473
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2810505
关于积分的说明 7888418
捐赠科研通 2469473
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1314873
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 630722
版权声明 602012