挛缩
医学
烧伤
可靠性(半导体)
烧伤
物理疗法
外科
物理医学与康复
伤口愈合
量子力学
物理
功率(物理)
作者
Ingrid Parry,Kimberly Walker,Jonathan Niszczak,Tina L Palmieri,David G. Greenhalgh
出处
期刊:Journal of Burn Care & Research
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2010-11-01
卷期号:31 (6): 888-903
被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1097/bcr.0b013e3181f9354f
摘要
After burn injury, scar contracture can cause significant impairment and functional deficit. Many studies have investigated the treatment and prevention of burn scar contracture, but few studies have focused on the methods for measuring contracture. The purpose of this study was to determine whether consistent and objective methods of measurement are used to quantify scar contracture in the clinical evaluation of burn patients and in burn research. A survey was administered to 407 burn therapists to determine the methods and tools used clinically to measure scar contracture, while a review of recent burn literature was conducted to determine the methods and tools used in burn research. The results of the survey indicate that there is a lack of consensus in the methods and tools used for the measurement of scar contracture, both clinically and in research. Instead, a variety of measurement methods was reported, each with varying degrees of objectivity. Clinically, the methods are rarely checked for reliability or performance competency. In burn research, the methods and tools vary, and contracture data obtained are often reported in an inconsistent manner. If the measurement of scar contracture is not done objectively and consistently, then it is difficult to determine reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the measurement methods. Development of standard protocols with reliable measures of scar contracture would improve the quality of burn care and research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI