可比性
人均
食物供应
食物摄入量
人口
回归分析
协变量
农业
线性回归
农业经济学
统计
地理
农业科学
医学
人口学
环境卫生
动物科学
数学
环境科学
经济
生物
内科学
社会学
组合数学
考古
作者
Zach Conrad,Kenneth Chui,Lisa Jahns,Christian J. Peters,Timothy J. Griffin
出处
期刊:Public Health Nutrition
[Cambridge University Press]
日期:2017-09-20
卷期号:20 (17): 3045-3050
被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1017/s1368980017002385
摘要
Abstract Objective To examine the comparability of fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake data in the USA from 2001 to 2014 between data acquired from two national data collection programmes. Design Cross-sectional analysis. Linear regression models estimated trends in daily per capita intake of total F&V. Pooled differences in intake of individual F&V ( n 109) were examined by processing form (fresh, frozen, canned, dried and juice). Setting What We Eat in America (WWEIA, 2001–2014) and Loss-Adjusted Food Availability data series (LAFA, 2001–2014). Results No temporal trends were observed in daily per capita intake of total F&V from 2001 to 2014 using WWEIA and LAFA. Modest differences between WWEIA and LAFA were observed in mean pooled intake of most individual F&V. Conclusions WWEIA and LAFA produced similar estimates of F&V intake. However, WWEIA may be best suited for monitoring intake at the national level because it allows for the identification of individual F&V in foods with multiple ingredients, and it is structured for sub-population analysis and covariate control. LAFA does retain advantages for other research protocols, specifically by providing the only nationally representative estimates of food losses at various points in the food system, which makes it useful for examining the adequacy of the food supply at the agricultural, retail and consumer levels.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI