医学
外科
回顾性队列研究
血管瘤
并发症
微波消融
失血
肝细胞癌
内科学
经皮
作者
Libo Chen,Lei Zhang,Min Tian,Qinggang Hu,Lei Zhao,Jun Xiong
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2019.02.001
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic microwave ablation (LMWA) as compared with conventional open resection (ORES) for the treatment of giant hepatic hemangioma.and analysis: A retrospective chart review was conduct on patients with hepatic hemangioma underwent LMWA or ORES between 2014 and 2016.Of 131 patients, 37 patients underwent ORES and 94 patients underwent LMWA. Blood loss, operative time, postoperative hospital stay, hospital cost (RMB) were significantly different between two groups. Patients after LMWA experienced significantly less pain than those patients undergoing ORES. At a mean follow-up period of 12.8 ± 3.6 months in ORES group and 13.5 ± 2.5 months in LMWA group, no long-term complication was observed.Compared with ORES, LMWA is a safe and effective minimally invasive for treating giant hepatic hemangioma.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI