发电
生命周期评估
电
水力发电
独立电源系统
风力发电
持续性
环境科学
环境经济学
火力发电站
核能
按来源划分的电力成本
可再生能源
分布式发电
工程类
废物管理
功率(物理)
生产(经济)
电气工程
经济
生物
物理
量子力学
宏观经济学
生态学
作者
Qiang Yue,Shupeng Li,Xiangzheng Hu,Yujie Zhang,Xue Meng,Heming Wang
标识
DOI:10.1002/ente.201900365
摘要
Electricity generation in China is currently dominated by thermal power generation (TPG). To achieve sustainable development during electricity generation, this study compares the sustainability of the six main approaches for electricity generation in Liaoning Province: thermal power, nuclear power, wind power, hydropower, photovoltaic power, and biomass power generation. First, the environmental impact and unit electricity generation cost (UEGC) of each electricity generation approach is calculated and analyzed from the perspectives of both life‐cycle assessment (LCA) and life‐cycle cost (LCC). Then, the energy potential of electricity generation approaches in Liaoning Province is calculated. Finally, the entropy‐weighted method is used to combine the environmental impacts, UEGC, and energy potentials of each energy source, producing a mathematical evaluation model for determining the sustainability of electricity generation. As a result, the six approaches are ranked in terms of electricity sustainability in Liaoning Province as follows: wind power, nuclear power, biomass power, hydropower, solar power, and thermal power. In future development of the electricity industry, Liaoning Province should increase the proportion of wind power, nuclear power, and biomass power generation in total installed capacity and reduce the proportion of thermal power in total installed capacity.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI