Therapeutic effect of regulating autophagy in spinal cord injury: a network meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparisons

自噬 脊髓损伤 医学 荟萃分析 体内 脊髓 细胞凋亡 麻醉 神经保护 内科学 生物 精神科 生物化学 生物技术
作者
Duo Zhang,Di Zhu,Fang Wang,Jichao Zhu,Xu Zhai,Yuan Yuan,Chenxi Li
出处
期刊:Neural Regeneration Research [Medknow Publications]
卷期号:15 (6): 1120-1120 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.4103/1673-5374.270419
摘要

An increasing number of studies indicate that autophagy plays an important role in the pathogenesis of spinal cord injury, and that regulating autophagy can enhance recovery from spinal cord injury. However, the effect of regulating autophagy and whether autophagy is detrimental or beneficial after spinal cord injury remain unclear. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the effects of autophagy regulation on spinal cord injury in rats by direct and indirect comparison, in an effort to provide a basis for further research.Relevant literature published from inception to February 1, 2018 were included by searching Wanfang, CNKI, Web of Science, MEDLINE (OvidSP), PubMed and Google Scholar in English and Chinese. The keywords included "autophagy", "spinal cord injury", and "rat".The literature included in vivo experimental studies on autophagy regulation in the treatment of spinal cord injury (including intervention pre- and post-spinal cord injury). Meta-analyses were conducted at different time points to compare the therapeutic effects of promoting or inhibiting autophagy, and subgroup analyses were also conducted.Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scores.Of the 622 studies, 33 studies of median quality were included in the analyses. Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scores were higher at 1 day (MD = 1.80, 95% CI: 0.81-2.79, P = 0.0004), 3 days (MD = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72-1.13, P < 0.00001), 1 week (MD = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.85-2.92, P < 0.00001), 2 weeks (MD = 3.26, 95% CI: 2.40-4.13, P < 0.00001), 3 weeks (MD = 3.13, 95% CI: 2.51-3.75, P < 0.00001) and 4 weeks (MD = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.43-3.92, P < 0.00001) after spinal cord injury with upregulation of autophagy compared with the control group (drug solvent control, such as saline group). Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scores were higher at 1 day (MD = 6.48, 95% CI: 5.83-7.13, P < 0.00001), 2 weeks (MD = 2.43, 95% CI: 0.79-4.07, P = 0.004), 3 weeks (MD = 2.96, 95% CI: 0.09-5.84, P = 0.04) and 4 weeks (MD = 4.41, 95% CI: 1.08-7.75, P = 0.01) after spinal cord injury with downregulation of autophagy compared with the control group. Indirect comparison of upregulation and downregulation of autophagy showed no differences in Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scores at 1 day (MD = -4.68, 95% CI: -5.840 to -3.496, P = 0.94644), 3 days (MD = -0.28, 95% CI: -2.231-1.671, P = 0.99448), 1 week (MD = 1.83, 95% CI: 0.0076-3.584, P = 0.94588), 2 weeks (MD = 0.81, 95% CI: -0.850-2.470, P = 0.93055), 3 weeks (MD = 0.17, 95% CI: -2.771-3.111, P = 0.99546) or 4 weeks (MD = -1.23, 95% CI: -4.647-2.187, P = 0.98264) compared with the control group.Regulation of autophagy improves neurological function, whether it is upregulated or downregulated. There was no difference between upregulation and downregulation of autophagy in the treatment of spinal cord injury. The variability in results among the studies may be associated with differences in research methods, the lack of clearly defined autophagy characteristics after spinal cord injury, and the limited autophagy monitoring techniques. Thus, methods should be standardized, and the dynamic regulation of autophagy should be examined in future studies.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ROMANTIC完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
NIHAO完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Zhang完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
韭菜盒子发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
12秒前
科目三应助万历采纳,获得10
13秒前
jrzsy完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
22秒前
万历发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
swordshine完成签到,获得积分0
24秒前
yyyyxxxg完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
LS发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
ramsey33完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
万历完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
雪儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
drughunter009完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
逃之姚姚完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
wwho_O完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
SciGPT应助axiao采纳,获得10
39秒前
J_Xu完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
科目三应助cjy采纳,获得10
43秒前
LS完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
44秒前
lxaiczn应助蔡从安采纳,获得10
50秒前
lxaiczn应助蔡从安采纳,获得10
50秒前
qwe完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
Lyw完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
51秒前
axiao发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
55秒前
上菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
小波发布了新的文献求助10
56秒前
yy发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
忧虑的靖巧完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
靓丽藏花完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.1应助cjy采纳,获得10
1分钟前
s_yu完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
了0完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 生物化学 化学工程 物理 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6021732
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7635442
关于积分的说明 16166869
捐赠科研通 5169562
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2766488
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1749483
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1636588