心理学
听力学
刺激形态
模态(人机交互)
模式
听觉感知
听觉刺激
感觉系统
发展心理学
认知心理学
感知
神经科学
人工智能
医学
社会学
计算机科学
社会科学
作者
Eunice N. Simões,Ana Lúcia Novais Carvalho,Sergio L. Schmidt
标识
DOI:10.1177/1087054718769149
摘要
Objective: Continuous performance tests (CPTs) usually utilize visual stimuli. A previous investigation showed that inattention is partially independent of modality, but response inhibition is modality-specific. Here we aimed to compare performance on visual and auditory CPTs in ADHD and in healthy controls. Method: The sample consisted of 160 elementary and high school students (43 ADHD, 117 controls). For each sensory modality, five variables were extracted: commission errors (CEs) and omission errors (OEs), reaction time (RT), variability of reaction time (VRT), and coefficient of variability (CofV = VRT / RT). Results: The ADHD group exhibited higher rates for all test variables. The discriminant analysis indicated that auditory OE was the most reliable variable for discriminating between groups, followed by visual CE, auditory CE, and auditory CofV. Discriminant equation classified ADHD with 76.3% accuracy. Conclusion: Auditory parameters in the inattention domain (OE and VRT) can discriminate ADHD from controls. For the hyperactive/impulsive domain (CE), the two modalities are equally important.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI