自由度(物理和化学)
工作(物理)
计算机科学
点(几何)
国家(计算机科学)
功能(生物学)
缩小
瞬态(计算机编程)
粒子(生态学)
控制理论(社会学)
作者
Varda F. Hagh,Sidney R. Nagel,Andrea J. Liu,M. Lisa Manning,Eric I. Corwin
标识
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2117622119
摘要
SignificanceMany protocols used in material design and training have a common theme: they introduce new degrees of freedom, often by relaxing away existing constraints, and then evolve these degrees of freedom based on a rule that leads the material to a desired state at which point these new degrees of freedom are frozen out. By creating a unifying framework for these protocols, we can now understand that some protocols work better than others because the choice of new degrees of freedom matters. For instance, introducing particle sizes as degrees of freedom to the minimization of a jammed particle packing can lead to a highly stable state, whereas particle stiffnesses do not have nearly the same impact.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI