Central Venous Catheter Guidewire Retention: Lessons From England’s Never Event Database

错误 医学 检查表 事件(粒子物理) 外科 心理学 政治学 法学 物理 量子力学 认知心理学
作者
Maryanne Mariyaselvam,Vikesh Patel,Holly Young,Mark Blunt,Peter Young
出处
期刊:Journal of Patient Safety [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:18 (2): e387-e392 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1097/pts.0000000000000826
摘要

Objectives Guidewire retention during central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is considered a “never event.” We analyzed the National Health Service England Never Event database (2004–2015) to explore the process of guidewire retention and identify potential preventative measures. Methods We performed a systematic analysis of reported retained guidewire incidents by 3 independent reviewers. Results There was a rising frequency of reported retained CVC guidewires, with an average of 2 never events per month. Only 11% of retained guidewires are identified during the procedure itself, with the remainder identified during equipment clear-up (6%), after the procedure (4%), at the first check radiograph (23%), or after the first radiograph (55%). In 59 cases, the grade of the operator was reported, and among these, 88% were inserted by trainee doctors. Analysis of causative factors was only possible for 38 cases, and of these, operator’s mistake (32%), operator/human error (16%), and distraction (16%) were the most common. Of 163 reported cases, preventative measures instigated were actions taken against the individual clinician (36%), departmental actions such as investigations, additional teaching or reminders (37%), and additional checklists (27%). Conclusions Most retained guidewires are discovered after the procedure. Despite the introduction of safety measures, guidewire retention still occurs because the checks, alerts, reminders, and additional checklists all solely rely on the operator remembering not to make the mistake. System changes or design modifications to the CVC equipment are needed to prevent guidewire retention, this being at the top of the hierarchy of intervention effectiveness.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xdmhv完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
mm完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
内向的醉蝶完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
Lucas应助孙晓婷采纳,获得10
5秒前
孟古完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
8秒前
打打应助阔达蓝血采纳,获得10
10秒前
夏日香气发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
英俊的铭应助AC赵先生采纳,获得10
13秒前
15秒前
15秒前
文静的人雄完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
隐形曼青应助惠翎采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
曾玉婷发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
乐观啤酒应助Loik采纳,获得10
20秒前
阔达蓝血完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
lhh发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
Lu完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
SYLH应助哈哈哈采纳,获得10
23秒前
sml发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
小王发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
AC赵先生发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
惠翎完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
yueyue3SCI发布了新的文献求助20
28秒前
自信鬼神完成签到,获得积分20
30秒前
Gilbert发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
搜集达人应助追寻麦片采纳,获得10
30秒前
嘎嘎发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
32秒前
英勇皮卡丘完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
38秒前
zho应助hb采纳,获得10
38秒前
科研通AI5应助夏日香气采纳,获得10
38秒前
搜集达人应助自信鬼神采纳,获得30
39秒前
小小二完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
高分求助中
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Am Rande der Geschichte : mein Leben in China / Ruth Weiss 1500
CENTRAL BOOKS: A BRIEF HISTORY 1939 TO 1999 by Dave Cope 1000
Machine Learning Methods in Geoscience 1000
Resilience of a Nation: A History of the Military in Rwanda 888
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3738341
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3281845
关于积分的说明 10026652
捐赠科研通 2998667
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1645324
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 782749
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 749901