作者
Eunice Lee,Farida S. Akhtari,John S. House,Ross J. Simpson,Charles Schmitt,David C. Fargo,Shepherd H. Schurman,Janet E. Hall,Alison A. Motsinger‐Reif
摘要
While multiple factors are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), many environmental exposures that may contribute to CVD have not been examined. To understand environmental effects on cardiovascular health, we performed an exposome-wide association study (ExWAS), a hypothesis-free approach, using survey data on endogenous and exogenous exposures at home and work and data from health and medical histories from the North Carolina-based Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS) (n = 5015). We performed ExWAS analyses separately on six cardiovascular outcomes (cardiac arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, heart attack, stroke, and a combined atherogenic-related outcome comprising angina, angioplasty, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, heart attack, and stroke) using logistic regression and a false discovery rate of 5%. For each CVD outcome, we tested 502 single exposures and built multi-exposure models using the deletion-substitution-addition (DSA) algorithm. To evaluate complex nonlinear relationships, we employed the knockoff boosted tree (KOBT) algorithm. We adjusted all analyses for age, sex, race, BMI, and annual household income. ExWAS analyses revealed novel associations that include blood type A (Rh-) with heart attack (OR[95%CI] = 8.2[2.2:29.7]); paint exposures with stroke (paint related chemicals: 6.1[2.2:16.0], acrylic paint: 8.1[2.6:22.9], primer: 6.7[2.2:18.6]); biohazardous materials exposure with arrhythmia (1.8[1.5:2.3]); and higher paternal education level with reduced risk of multiple CVD outcomes (stroke, heart attack, coronary artery disease, and combined atherogenic outcome). In multi-exposure models, trouble sleeping and smoking remained important risk factors. KOBT identified significant nonlinear effects of sleep disorder, regular intake of grapefruit, and a family history of blood clotting problems for multiple CVD outcomes (combined atherogenic outcome, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease). In conclusion, using statistics and machine learning, these findings identify novel potential risk factors for CVD, enable hypothesis generation, provide insights into the complex relationships between risk factors and CVD, and highlight the importance of considering multiple exposures when examining CVD outcomes.